Lower blood pressure could prove to be dangerous to patients with chronic kidney disease, an expert declares.

But in the absence of high-quality scientific evidence, there’s a chance this recommendation could do more harm than good, according to Julia B. Lewis, MD (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN), who performed a critical review of the research evidence.
"The new low blood pressure goals are not definitively supported by data, would be costly to the healthcare system and potentially harmful to patients," she says.
Issued last year, updated national guidelines for CKD treatment call for a target blood pressure level of less than 130/80 mm Hg (millimeters of mercury) to help preserve kidney function. The recommendation was based on observational studies showing "a continuous benefit of reducing blood pressure to lower and lower levels."
However, Lewis points out several problems with the research behind the new guidelines. Most importantly, since patients in the observational studies were not randomly assigned to different blood pressure goals, the apparent benefit of lower blood pressures could result from other "confounding" factors.
"The data supporting the current blood pressure guidelines for patients with CKD do not meet the standard of a primary outcome of a randomized trial," says Lewis.
Advertisement
In studies where patients were randomly assigned to treatments, the benefits of lower blood pressure were seen only in a subgroup of patients, or several years after the end of treatment.
Advertisement
Some studies have even suggested that CKD patients with very low blood pressure could be at increased risk of death.
A new trial sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) will compare the effects of different blood pressure targets in over 10,000 patients with CKD. Until the results are available, Lewis believes that doctors should make individualized decisions about blood pressure control for their patients with kidney disease.
Lewis emphasizes that no firm conclusions can be drawn from her review, since it was based on different types of studies with conflicting results.
The article appears in an upcoming issue of the Journal of the American Society Nephrology (JASN).
Source-ANI