Conscious experience may emerge from the brain's sensory regions, challenging long-standing theories that spotlight the prefrontal cortex.

Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness
Go to source).
TOP INSIGHT
Did You Know?
Turns out, the back of your brain might be doing the real thinking!
#consciousness #medindia
Great Consciousness Showdown
Two of the most debated theories in neuroscience—Integrated Information Theory (IIT) and Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT)—were put head-to-head in a large-scale scientific face-off. Instead of competing independently, scientists from around the world engaged in an “adversarial collaboration,” an open-science approach where both theory camps jointly developed predictions, methods, and analyses. This move eliminated bias and ensured unprecedented transparency.IIT suggests that consciousness arises from richly interconnected sensory areas in the posterior brain, while GNWT claims it’s the frontal cortex that broadcasts conscious experiences across the brain. This study was designed to settle the score through real-time brain data.
Visual Cortex Takes Center Stage
With over 250 participants undergoing advanced brain scans (fMRI, MEG, iEEG), researchers discovered that conscious perception lights up the back of the brain—particularly the visual and ventral temporal cortices. Surprisingly, prefrontal cortex activity was limited, contradicting GNWT’s core claim.This points to consciousness being rooted in sensory experience, not higher-order reasoning alone. Faces, letters, and even orientation of images could be decoded from sensory areas. GNWT's idea of “ignition” in the frontal cortex at stimulus onset and offset was largely absent. These findings suggest consciousness might be more about seeing than thinking.
Rethinking the Brain’s Role in Awareness
Despite well-defined predictions, both theories struggled under empirical scrutiny. IIT’s notion of ongoing, synchronized posterior activity was not fully supported—suggesting consciousness may not rely solely on persistent network states. GNWT fared worse, as its critical “offset response” never materialized, leaving its foundational mechanism in doubt.These challenges hint at a deeper truth: b>consciousness may not belong exclusively to any one region or function. Instead, a hybrid theory or entirely new model might better explain the intricate dance of awareness in the brain. Researchers now advocate for a quantitative, cross-modal approach to build more resilient models in the future.
References:
- Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness - (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-08888-1)
Source-Nature
MEDINDIA




Email










