When comparing households within individual villages, polygynous households often had better access to food and had healthier children.

The study findings support evolutionary anthropological accounts of marriage indicating that polygyny can be in a woman's strategic interest when women depend on men for resources.
One of the researchers Monique Borgerhoff Mulder from University of California, Davis in the US, said, "If you have a choice of a guy who has 180 cows, lots of land and other wives, it might be better for you to marry him rather than a guy who has no wives, three cows and one acre."
The study highlighted the importance of local context in studying the health implications of cultural practices, and suggest that in some settings, prohibiting polygyny could be disadvantageous to women by restricting their marriage options. Borgerhoff Mulder said, "The issue is not the number of partners. Women should be assured the autonomy to make the decisions they want."
Lead author of the study David Lawson from London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine explained, "Our study suggests that highly polygynous, predominantly Maasai, villages do poorly not because of polygyny, but because of vulnerability to drought, low service provision and broader socio-political disadvantages."
The study was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
MEDINDIA



Email





