Being the second-largest country for tobacco population, India might be missing a public health opportunity for safer alternatives to tobacco.

‘Being the second-largest country for tobacco population, India might be missing a public health opportunity for safer alternatives to tobacco. Scientific data urge for implementing fair and effective measures to direct consumers' behavior towards cigarettes.
’

Although the WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control was endorsed in 2014 by India, it wasn’t followed widely. Hence, immense health and economic crisis prevail concerning tobacco in India. 




Moreover, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) report exhilarated the Indian Government to ban safer alternatives of tobacco like e-cigarettes and other electronic nicotine delivery systems.
Disparity in Reaction
Contrastingly, Chaiwut Thanakamanusorn, Digital Economy and Society (DES) Minister, Thailand declared his ideas to legalize e-cigarettes (to the Tobacco Authority of Thailand and tobacco growers) for the benefit of adult smokers in quitting real cigarettes.
The global economies have been reaping the benefits of complementing these safer alternatives in tobacco policies. Although vaping was legalized in 67 countries, it was banned in Thailand until 2014 with hefty penalties if illicit.
Advertisement
It is estimated that 72,656 people died from smoking illnesses in 2017 in, Thailand as per a survey. Moreover, the Public Health Ministry of the country spends nearly 77 billion baht annually to treat smoking-induced disease and illness as per policymakers.
Advertisement
Need for Proper Measure
These data mandate the urgent need for the government to re-examine its public policy on smoking centered on health impact, the issue of the black market, freedom of choice, and the rationality behind hefty penalties on vaping.
Hence, the issue of e-cigarettes emphasizes the self-contradictory public policy on cigarette smoking – an incongruous fight between financial interest and health issue on each hand. Thailand's policy has tried to pursue both and ended up failing on both issues.
The health advocate camp rather calls for hefty tax rates on cigarettes to dissuade cigarettes consumption, especially for young and low-income consumers in Thailand. Many countries like the US and EU countries have benefitted from such enactment.
Although data on the health impacts of cigarettes versus e-cigarettes remain irrefutable, it is suggested that government leave the decision to people. Rather, implementing the need for all policy-makers to create a fair and effective mechanism to direct consumers' behavior is obligatory.
Source-Medindia