A recent study conducted by Thomson Reuters says that communities in the US, known for spending most on health care may not be paying out on it, as much as presumed.

"The real world is actually more complicated than some people might think, and that the patterns you see for the Medicare population aren't exactly the same as the patterns you see for adults or children in the same areas," said William Marder, leading the research.
The study shows the way to better ways of projecting how healthcare cuts affect a community, as Congress considers slashing federal spending on health care, ahead of a November deadline.
McAllen, Texas, a community known for the highest Medicare spending in the U.S. has been put on the list of the ten cheapest areas for individuals with employer-sponsored health insurance.
"What we're looking at here is that McAllen, Texas is actually a pretty cheap place when you start looking at people under age 65," said Marder. The findings, he said, should make policymakers pause before they change the healthcare system of the area without understanding spending patterns deeply.
The study did not examine the causes behind McAllen's spending disparity. Dartmouth Atlas project had earlier attributed McAllen’s high spending to doctors performing more tests and diagnostics when compared to similar towns.
Ogden and Clearfield, Utah were identified as the area spending the least on health care for the commercially insured at $2,623 per person. Anderson, Indiana was the most expensive area at $7,231 per person.
MEDINDIA



Email





