Medindia

X

Superbug MRSA Turns Super Killer

by Medindia Content Team on  October 17, 2007 at 6:00 PM General Health News   - G J E 4
Superbug MRSA Turns Super Killer
Shockingly enough, it is being reported that nearly 19,000 people died in the United States in 2005, after being infected with a virulent drug-resistant bacterium. The superbug had spread rampantly through hospitals and nursing homes, according to the most thorough study conducted of the disease's prevalence.
Advertisement

The study, published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association, suggests that invasive infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or M.R.S.A., may be twice as common as previously thought.

Advertisement
According to lead author, Dr. R. Monina Klevens, the number of deaths associated with M.R.S.A. each year exceed those attributed to HIV/AIDS,Parkinson's disease, emphysema or homicide.

By extrapolating data from nine locations, the researchers established the first true baseline for M.R.S.A. in the United States, projecting that 94,360 patients developed an invasive infection from the pathogen in 2005 and that nearly one of every five, or 18,650 of them, died.

The authors, who work for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cautioned that their methodology differed significantly from previous studies and that direct comparisons were therefore risky. Yet, they stressed that they were surprised by the prevalence of the serious infections they found, which they calculated as 32 cases per 100,000 people.

The study also gave that 85 percent of invasive M.R.S.A. infections are associated with health-care treatment. Previous research has indicated that many hospitals and long-term care centers have become breeding grounds for M.R.S.A. because bacteria may be transported from patient to patient by doctors, nurses and unsterile equipment.

"This confirms in a very rigorous way that this is a huge health problem," says Dr. John A. Jernigan, the deputy chief of prevention and response in the C.D.C.'s Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion. "And it drives home that what we do in health care will have a lot to do with how we control it."

The findings are likely to further stimulate an already active debate about whether hospitals and other medical centers should test all patients for M.R.S.A. upon admission. Some hospitals have had notable success in reducing their infection rates by isolating infected patients and then taking extra precautions, like requiring workers to wear gloves and gowns.

Yet, other research has suggested that such techniques may be excessive, and may have the unintended consequence of diminishing medical care for sequestered patients. The C.D.C., in guidelines released last year, recommended that hospitals attempt to reduce their infection rates by first improving hygiene procedures and that they resort to screening high-risk patients only if other methods fail.

Dr. Lance R. Peterson, an epidemiologist with Evanston Northwestern Healthcare, claims that the Chicago-area hospital system reduced its rate of invasive M.R.S.A. infections by 60 percent after it began screening all patients in 2005.

"This study puts more onus on organizations that don't do active surveillance to demonstrate that they're reducing their M.R.S.A. infections," he says. "Other things can work, but nothing else has been demonstrated to have this kind of impact. M.R.S.A. is theoretically a totally preventable disease."

Numerous studies have shown that busy hospital workers disregard basic standards of hand-washing more than half the time. This week, Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports, called for hospitals to begin publishing their hand-washing compliance rates.

"This study just accentuates that the hospital is ground zero, that this is where dangerous infections are occurring that are killing people every day," states Lisa A. McGiffert, manager of the group's "Stop Hospital Infections" campaign.

Though the C.D.C. estimates that M.R.S.A. represents only 10 percent to 20 percent of all infections acquired in health-care settings, the bacterium is feared for its opportunism and deadliness.

First isolated in the United States in 1968, it is resistant to a number of antibiotics and can cause infections of surgical sites, the urinary tract, the bloodstream and the lungs, leading to extensive and expensive hospital stays. The bacteria can be brought unknowingly into hospitals and nursing homes by patients who show no symptoms, and then take advantage of weakened immune systems, incisions and wounds.

Of the infections studied by Dr. Klevens and her colleagues, 27 percent were considered to have originated during a patient's current hospital stay. Another 58 percent were deemed to be associated with a previous hospitalization, nursing home stay, surgery or dialysis. Only 14 percent were cases without a defined health care risk factor, meaning the infection likely originated in the community.

In the new study, higher prevalence rates and death rates were found for the elderly, blacks and men. The figures also varied greatly by geography, with Baltimore's incidence rates far exceeding those of the eight other locations studied.

Dr. Klevens said further research would be needed to understand the racial and geographic disparities.

The C.D.C.'s latest estimate of all infections associated with health care, also taken from a study by Dr. Klevens, was 1.7 million cases and 99,000 associated deaths in 2002.

Source: Medindia
ANN/V
Advertisement

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

Advertisement
View All