Disadvantaged women in India are twice at risk of having stillbirths, a factor evident across the country.

‘Stillbirths are reducing across India, but there are still too many. Disadvantaged women are twice at risk of having stillbirths, a factor evident across the country.’

Among the risk factors: Lack of timely and quality antenatal monitoring and care; non-communicable diseases, such as hypertension and diabetes; nutritional factors, such as maternal anemia; biomedical factors, such as congenital abnormalities, infections, and lifestyle; environmental factors, such as drinking and smoking; and social determinants, including poverty, transportation and general living conditions. 




A Lancet study said that disadvantaged women are twice at risk of having stillbirths, a factor evident across India.
Among the reasons that make many women shy away from organized healthcare is - the discrimination they feel at health clinics, both government and NGO. They are made to wait for hours, and physicians often refuse to touch them.
For people without public transportation, traveling to a hospital is not easy. And to make the journey, they rely on husbands, who are often away at work.
Over the last few years, NGOS, such as PHRII, and government workers have run health camps for pregnant and post-natal women and infants, handing out information on maternal and child health, and have encouraged tribal women to be regularly checked at primary health centers. They don’t come though, and when they do, the discrimination does not help.
Advertisement
The ’Every Newborn Action Plan’, explained in the Lancet study, aims to bring the global stillbirth rate to 12 or lower per 1,000 births by 2030 (India in 2014 adopted the India Newborn Action Plan with the aim to reach a single-digit stillbirth target). That will require empowered women, better healthcare and progress checks.
Advertisement
Karnataka had 94% institutional deliveries according to data released recently by the National Family Health Survey. Uttarakhand and Meghalaya were the worst, with 61% and 58.4% respectively. The rest were home deliveries, most without trained-health-worker supervision and possibly in unhygienic conditions. The reported reasons for home delivery were convenience, fear of stitches, unavailability of transportation and the inability to afford hospitals.
JSY beneficiaries, since it launched a decade ago, increased from 0.74 million to 10.4 million in 2014-15. But this government review revealed that only 15% of JSY institutions were equipped to deal with institutional deliveries.
Source-IANS