A national campaign's anti-drug TV ads failed to convince young children and teenagers to stay away from marijuana, a new research has found.
In their 1999 to 2004 incarnation, the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign's TV ads "either had no effects on kids or possibly had a boomerang effect," said Robert Hornik, lead author of a new study and professor of communication at the University of Pennsylvania.
Drug Abuse
The use of Drugs for reasons other than its prescribed recommendation, is known as Drug abuse or substance abuse. Drug abuse or substance abuse is initiated by various biological and social factors.
Advertisement
The U.S. Congress created the anti-drug campaign in the late 1990s and gave almost $1 billion to it through 2004, according to the study. The taxpayer-funded campaign continues to create anti-drug advertising today.
The study appears online and in the December issue of the American Journal of Public Health.
The researchers surveyed 8,117 children from 1999 to 2001 and followed up with many of them over the next several years. The children were nine to18 years old when they were first recruited for the study, the same ages as the group targeted by the campaign's TV ads.
![Drug Abuse Screening Test]( "Drug Abuse Screening Test")
Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) is a screening test to find out if you need professional help with 'Drug Abuse' problem. This is only an anonymous self test.
Ninety-four percent of the kids reported seeing two to three of the anti-drug ads per week. But seeing the ads didn't reduce the likelihood that the children used marijuana. And it appeared that the ads possibly raised the risk that kids would be willing to try marijuana.
Of participants ages 12 to18 who reported seeing four or fewer ads from the campaign a month, 82 percent later reported that they "definitely" had no plans to smoke marijuana. The percentage fell to 78 percent among those who said they saw 12 or more ads a month.
The researchers adjusted the numbers to account for factors that may have affected the children's exposure to anti-drug advertising.
"Our basic hypothesis is that the more kids saw these ads, the more they came to believe that lots of other kids were using marijuana," Hornik said. "And the more they came to believe that other kids were using marijuana, the more they became more interested in using it themselves."
Jennifer de Vallance, a spokeswoman for the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, said the new study is "old news."
"The campaign has made major changes to improve its effectiveness and, in fact, drug use among teens has dropped steadily in nearly every category since 2001," she said.
Among other things, she said, the campaign has adjusted the messages of its advertising and is doing a better job of both analyzing ads before they air and evaluating their effectiveness afterward.
Source: Newswise
RAS/SK
The researchers surveyed 8,117 children from 1999 to 2001 and followed up with many of them over the next several years. The children were nine to18 years old when they were first recruited for the study, the same ages as the group targeted by the campaign's TV ads.
Drug Abuse Screening Test
Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) is a screening test to find out if you need professional help with 'Drug Abuse' problem. This is only an anonymous self test.
Advertisement
Ninety-four percent of the kids reported seeing two to three of the anti-drug ads per week. But seeing the ads didn't reduce the likelihood that the children used marijuana. And it appeared that the ads possibly raised the risk that kids would be willing to try marijuana.
Of participants ages 12 to18 who reported seeing four or fewer ads from the campaign a month, 82 percent later reported that they "definitely" had no plans to smoke marijuana. The percentage fell to 78 percent among those who said they saw 12 or more ads a month.
The researchers adjusted the numbers to account for factors that may have affected the children's exposure to anti-drug advertising.
"Our basic hypothesis is that the more kids saw these ads, the more they came to believe that lots of other kids were using marijuana," Hornik said. "And the more they came to believe that other kids were using marijuana, the more they became more interested in using it themselves."
Jennifer de Vallance, a spokeswoman for the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign, said the new study is "old news."
"The campaign has made major changes to improve its effectiveness and, in fact, drug use among teens has dropped steadily in nearly every category since 2001," she said.
Among other things, she said, the campaign has adjusted the messages of its advertising and is doing a better job of both analyzing ads before they air and evaluating their effectiveness afterward.
Source: Newswise
RAS/SK
Behaviour Risks Increase If Teens Use Drugs and Alcohol Early in Life
Children who try drugs or alcohol before age 15 run a greater risk of being substance-dependent as adults, contracting sexually transmitted diseases, dropping out of school or being
Advertisement
Scientists Find Why Methamphetamine is So Addictive and Damaging to BrainA study has cast new light on why the drug methamphetamine is very addictive and damaging to the brain. | Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Latest Alcohol & Drug Abuse News
The United States is currently witnessing its highest overall mortality rates in over a century, driven in part by the surge in drug overdose fatalities.
Deciphering genetic factors in brain responses to METH and COC enables personalized approaches to combat drug abuse.
Giving rats DORA-12 during oxycodone withdrawal reduced future drug-seeking behavior, showing promise for preventing opioid addiction and relapse in humans.
Rising to 9.6% in 2021, daily vaping among New Zealand's 14-year-old students underscores a concerning youth trend.
The research also revealed a 22 percent increase in cadmium levels among marijuana users.
