
We
have adapted our minds to thinking of hospitals as givers of charitable care in
the business of life saving, without being aware of the price we pay
financially for this care.
Steven
Brill's cover story in the Time magazine, shows that non-profit hospitals take
a 12% profit margin on everything from cardio stress tests to gauze pads.
Advertisement
The health care system in the U.S is known for confused incentives and over treatment. The U.S spends $9000 moreper capita per year on health care. Brill's report exposes the issue very simply - as overcharging.
The
charges for the same medical services can vary widely, even within the same
area geographically. Brill refers to the hospital price lists as chargemasters.
The hospital administrators don't even try to justify the high prices, their argument being that insurance companies will anyway bargain for lower prices. As a result people with very little or no insurance are also paying these inflated prices. The difference is that a woman is billed $6,500 for a C.T scan for which Medicare pays only $1000.
When Medicare, Medicaid and insurance companies are transparent about the prices they pay - only then would prices fall. Aetna and the State of New Hampshire have started doing this.
This kind of transparency will improve health care system in the U.S, but many hospitals have contracts with insurers that contain gag clauses which ban the public release of their pricing system. These gag clauses should be prohibited.
The State Health Exchanges, which are being set up will also confront price issues by Insurance companies selling their products through online marketplaces. They would need to establish themselves as providers with a record for charging moderate prices for good quality health care.
When a patient is referred for medical tests, it should be ensured that doctors have no financial involvement with the said facility. The American Medical Association's Relative Value Scale Update Committee -- a 31-member group that is led by specialists, has only one seat made available to a primary care worker, Medicare accepts the prices set by this committee in majority cases. In fact the committee should examine the prices paid to physicians.
In fact as Medicare, Medicaid and Insurance companies pay majority of the bills, it would be to their advantage if they could work on uniform pricing.
References:
Hannah Punitha (IRDA Licence Number: 2710062)
Editors Bloomberg View Newsletter, Feb 2013
Source: Medindia
Advertisement
The hospital administrators don't even try to justify the high prices, their argument being that insurance companies will anyway bargain for lower prices. As a result people with very little or no insurance are also paying these inflated prices. The difference is that a woman is billed $6,500 for a C.T scan for which Medicare pays only $1000.
When Medicare, Medicaid and insurance companies are transparent about the prices they pay - only then would prices fall. Aetna and the State of New Hampshire have started doing this.
This kind of transparency will improve health care system in the U.S, but many hospitals have contracts with insurers that contain gag clauses which ban the public release of their pricing system. These gag clauses should be prohibited.
The State Health Exchanges, which are being set up will also confront price issues by Insurance companies selling their products through online marketplaces. They would need to establish themselves as providers with a record for charging moderate prices for good quality health care.
When a patient is referred for medical tests, it should be ensured that doctors have no financial involvement with the said facility. The American Medical Association's Relative Value Scale Update Committee -- a 31-member group that is led by specialists, has only one seat made available to a primary care worker, Medicare accepts the prices set by this committee in majority cases. In fact the committee should examine the prices paid to physicians.
In fact as Medicare, Medicaid and Insurance companies pay majority of the bills, it would be to their advantage if they could work on uniform pricing.
References:
Hannah Punitha (IRDA Licence Number: 2710062)
Editors Bloomberg View Newsletter, Feb 2013
Source: Medindia
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Recommended Readings
Latest Health Insurance News

Discontinuities in health insurance coverage among older Americans, who experience a higher prevalence of health concerns compared to the broader population.

The distance one must travel can pose a significant obstacle to healthcare access for people dealing with chronic neurological conditions.

Inability to afford better healthcare is apparent in the appearance of the malnourished poor, just as the obese reveal the "cost" of their health.

Medicaid expansion was linked to enhancement in insurance coverage for optimal heart health.

The results highlight the positive impact of Medicaid telemedicine coverage and its implications for policymakers.