Current Blood Transfusion Practice in Trauma Centers Feasible but Wastes Scarce Plasma: Study

by Rukmani Krishna on  July 18, 2013 at 12:12 AM General Health News
RSS Email Print This Page Comment bookmark
Font : A-A+

According to a randomized trial published in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal), the use of a 1:1:1 blood transfusion protocol in patients with severe trauma is feasible in hospitals, although it is associated with higher waste of plasma.
 Current Blood Transfusion Practice in Trauma Centers Feasible but Wastes Scarce Plasma: Study
Current Blood Transfusion Practice in Trauma Centers Feasible but Wastes Scarce Plasma: Study

Previous retrospective studies suggested that a 1:1:1 transfusion strategy or fixed-ratio transfusion could reduce the number of deaths from hemorrhage; therefore, the strategy has been widely adopted in trauma centres around the world and for nontrauma patients. It uses an equal ratio of red blood cells, plasma and platelets to transfuse patients and has been in use since 2007. However, 1:1:1 is associated with higher waste of blood plasma.

Researchers conducted a randomized trial to determine feasibility and safety of 1:1:1 in 78 patients presenting to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, a large trauma centre in Toronto, Canada, with low blood pressure and substantial bleeding who were expected to need massive blood transfusion. About half the patients (40) were randomly assigned to the fixed-ratio transfusion, and the remaining (38) underwent the laboratory-guided transfusion protocol at the centre.

"These findings suggest that a fixed-ratio transfusion protocol is feasible, but it was associated with increased plasma wastage (about 2 units per patient)," writes Dr. Sandro Rizoli, Trauma Program Director, St Michael's Hospital, and Professor of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, with coauthors. Thawed type AB plasma, a scarce resource, is needed for 1:1:1 transfusion which also involves delays because of the need to thaw the material.

However, deaths from all causes after 28 days was higher in the fixed-ratio group (32.5%) compared with 14% in the control group and there was a higher rate of respiratory distress in the patients receiving 1:1:1.

"Widespread adoption of the [1:1:1] strategy has significant resource and safety implications. Its full implementation requires access to thawed type AB plasma, which is chronically in short supply. ...the 1:1:1 transfusion protocol may lead to unnecessary exposure to blood components and an increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction," write the authors.

They caution that widespread implementation of the 1:1:1 transfusion strategy will be challenging because of an increased demand for plasma, a scarce resource, and higher wastage. Larger clinical trials should be conducted to provide more data.

Source: Eurekalert

Post a Comment

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
Notify me when reply is posted
I agree to the terms and conditions

More News on:

Thalassemia Trauma Care Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Blood in Stools - Symptom Evaluation Bombay Blood Group Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery Blood Transfusion Postpartum Hemorrhage Blood-Borne Diseases 

News A - Z


News Search

Medindia Newsletters

Subscribe to our Free Newsletters!

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Find a Doctor

Stay Connected

  • Available on the Android Market
  • Available on the App Store

News Category

News Archive