The fast-cooked yellow bean Cebo Cela contained 20 percent more protein, 10 percent more iron and 10 percent more zinc than slower varieties.

TOP INSIGHT
Fast-cooked beans maintained higher protein and mineral content than the moderate- and slow-cooking varieties.
To prepare food, many people with limited resources rely on burning wood, charcoal or other biofuels that can require a lot of time to gather or a relatively high percentage of their income. For those reasons, faster-cooking beans would be a good dietary option, but whether they carry the same nutritional value as slower-cooking varieties were unknown. So Karen A. Cichy, from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and colleagues set out to test them.
The researchers analyzed the nutritional value of 12 fast-, moderate- and slow-cooking dry bean cultivars from four classes: yellow, cranberry, light red kidney and red mottled. The speedier beans maintained higher protein and mineral content after they were prepared than the moderate- and slow-cooking varieties.
For example, the fast-cooking yellow bean Cebo Cela contained 20 percent more protein, 10 percent more iron and 10 percent more zinc than the yellow bean Canario, which took twice as long to prepare. Further testing showed that the iron bioavailability -- the amount that a person's body would absorb -- is also higher in the quicker-cooking beans in each of the four classes examined.
Source-Eurekalert
MEDINDIA



Email




