The ability to measure how quickly a young person is aging may in the future enable us to engage in interventions that slow aging or target specific diseases.

In a paper that appeared in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, they showed that even among young adults, a person’s biological age may differ by many years from their actual chronological age.
For example, among 38-year-olds studied, the participants’ biological age was found to range from under 30 years old to nearly 60 years old. That means that some participants’ biological age was more than 20 years older than their birth certificates indicated.
"Most studies of aging look at seniors but if we want to be able to prevent age-related disease, we are going to have to start studying aging in young people," said Dan Belsky, assistant professor of geriatrics in Duke University and the study’s first author.
Working with study participants from age 26 to 38, the scientists identified factors that can determine whether people are aging faster or slower than their peers, and to quantify both their biological age and how quickly they are aging.
Based on the biomarkers like functions of kidneys, liver, lungs, metabolic and immune systems, good cholesterol, cardiorespiratory fitness, lung function and dental health, the team determined a biological age for each participant.
The biologically older individuals also reported having more difficulties with physical functioning than their peers such as walking up stairs.
The ultimate goal of the research is to be able to intervene in the aging process itself, rather than addressing killers like heart disease or cancer in isolation.
"The ability to measure how quickly a young person is aging may in the future enable us to engage in interventions that slow aging or target specific diseases," said Salomon Israel, senior lecturer in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Source-IANS
MEDINDIA




Email




