From mountaintop mining to shale-plumbing to coastal drilling now. Though in its last days, the Bush administration is going full steam with its 'energy' mission, no matter what happens to the environment.
The federal government is taking steps that may open California's fabled coast to oil drilling in the next three years. Environmentalists are already haunted by a vision of dozens of platforms off the coasts, oil spills and air pollution.
AdvertisementThe ban on coastal drilling, beginning in 1981, ended this year when Congress let the moratorium lapse. Rigs could go up in 2012.
The Interior Department says that coastal areas nationwide affected by the drilling ban contain 18 billion barrels of oil and 76 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the "yet-to-be-discovered fields." The estimates are only conservative and are based on seismic surveys in the late 1970s and early 1980s, before the moratorium went into effect.
The agency's last estimate puts about 10 billion barrels in California, enough to supply the nation for 17 months.
"If you were allowed to go out and do new exploration, those numbers could go up or down. In most cases, you would expect them to go up," said Dave Smith, deputy communications officer of the Interior Department's Minerals Management Service, which oversees energy development in federal waters.
California's treasured coast, with its migrating whales, millions of seabirds, sea otters, fish and crab feeding grounds, beaches and tidal waters, are at risk, environmentalists say.
They hope that the prospect of explosive blasts from seismic air guns that map rock formations, increased vessel traffic and oil spills should be enough to persuade federal agencies to thwart petroleum exploration.
In California, any exploration and drilling would be close to shore, experts point out. In contrast to the Gulf of Mexico, where drilling could occur in waters 10,000 feet deep, California's holdings lie on its narrow, shallow continental shelf, the underwater edge of land where creatures died over the millennia to produce the oil.
Richard Charter, a lobbyist for the Defenders of Wildlife Action Fund who worked for three decades to win congressional bans on offshore drilling, warned California's coastal-dependent economy would be badly affected if the moves eventually materialized.
If the Interior Department decides to explore off California's coast, it could probably do so, some attorneys say. If a state objects to a lease plan, the president has the final say.
Once an area has been leased, the California Coastal Commission may review an oil company's plan to explore or extract resources to assess if it is consistent with the state's coastal management program. Conflicts can end up in court, said Alison Dettmer, the commission's deputy director.
Californians have generally opposed drilling since a platform blowout in 1969 splashed 3 million gallons of black, gooey crude oil on 35 miles of beaches around Santa Barbara, killing otters and seabirds. The destruction of shoreline and wildlife sparked activism and led to the creation of the Coastal Commission.
But when gas prices peaked a few months ago amid cries of "drill, baby, drill" at rallies for GOP presidential candidate John McCain and running mate Sarah Palin, 51 percent of Californians said they favored more offshore drilling, according to a survey by the Public Policy Institute of California.
In July, Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne jump-started the development of a new oil and natural gas leasing program and pushed up possible new coastal activity by two years.
The Interior Department is reviewing comments about which coastal areas to include in the next five-year leasing plan. Oil companies want all of the nation's coastal areas open and say they can produce oil offshore in a way that protects the environment. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who opposes new offshore development, has offered comments, as have environmental groups.
The incoming Obama's administration and Congress will have the final say over which regions, if any, would be put up for possible lease sales.
In Congress earlier this year, Ken Salazar, Obama's nominee for interior secretary, supported a bipartisan bill allowing exploration and production 50 miles out from the southern Atlantic coast with state approval. The bill died.
"We've been encouraged that the president-elect has chosen Sen. Salazar," said Dan Naatz, vice president for federal resources with the Independent Petroleum Association of America, a group with 5,000 members that drill 90 percent of the oil and natural gas wells in the United States. "He's from the West, and he understands federal land policy, which is really key."
During this year's presidential campaign, Obama was bombarded by questions about high gas prices and said new domestic drilling wouldn't do much to lower gasoline prices but could have a place in a comprehensive energy program, writes Jane Kay in San Francisco Chronicle.
After introducing his green team of environment and energy chiefs recently, Obama said the foundation of the nation's energy independence lies in the "power of wind and solar, in new crops and new technologies, in the innovation of our scientists and entrepreneurs and the dedication and skill of our workforce."
He spoke of moving "beyond our oil addiction," creating "a new, hybrid economy" and investing in "renewable energy that will give life to new businesses and industries."
Obama didn't mention oil drilling. When a reporter asked him if he would reinstate the moratorium, he said he wasn't happy that the moratorium was allowed to lapse in Congress without a broader thought to how the country was going to reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
He reiterated his campaign position that he was open to the idea of offshore drilling if it was part of a comprehensive package, adding that he would turn over the question to his team.
Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, a member of the House Natural Resources Committee, supportive of the Obama's stance, says she would like to see drilling occur only on land and in the Gulf of Mexico where infrastructure is in place.
Capps well remembers the Santa Barbara spill almost 40 years ago.
"I was living in Goleta. I just had two children, and my husband was a young professor at UC Santa Barbara. It was a devastating experience," she said. "The birds and other animals got trapped in the oil. So many people waded out in boots just inch by inch trying to rescue our wildlife. It ruined our tourism for many years.
"I think about it all the time, especially last week when we had had a spill at the same platform. It was a small spill, 1,000 gallons, but it was a wake-up call."
P US-Japanese Study Finds Genes for 1918 'Spanish Flu' Pandemic Occasional Tipple May Delay The Inception Of Dementia In Women M
You May Also Like