According to the University of Sheffield (UK) scientists, bladder cancer patients over the age of 60 are less likely to receive treatments intended to cure their disease than younger patients.
Research published in the British Journal of Cancer shows older patients miss out on treatments such as radiotherapy or surgery to remove the bladder - however the difference cannot be fully explained by age.
Scientists from the University of Sheffield, funded by Yorkshire Cancer Research (YCR) looked at the records of around 3,300 bladder cancer patients diagnosed in Sheffield between 1994 and 2009. They wanted to investigate how age, type of bladder cancer and treatment affected the chances of surviving the disease.
James Catto, study author from the University's Department of Oncology and consultant urological surgeon said: "Even though it appears that older patients are more likely to have aggressive tumours, our findings suggest that not enough older patients are being offered treatments that could increase their chance of survival. What's very worrying is this conservative approach to treating older patients appears to be affecting the life expectancy of this group, something that doctors must work hard to combat."
Dr Kathryn Scott, head of research funding at Yorkshire Cancer Research, said: "This research shows that the age of bladder cancer patients in Sheffield greatly affects how they are treated. This has a considerable effect on mortality rates in elderly bladder cancer patients and Yorkshire, along with the rest of the UK, is going to have to change to address this striking difference."
Sarah Woolnough, executive director of policy and information at Cancer Research UK, said: "This study shows the older the patients are the less likely they are to be offered the kind of treatments that could cure their cancer. These decisions are never easy and need to be balanced with quality of life but it's vital for patients of all ages to be given the option of a possible cure when it is still feasible."