Places that allow doctors to treat a patient's sexual partner without an in-person visit may find more success lowering rates of sexually transmitted diseases.

TOP INSIGHT
Sexually transmitted infections have been around for thousands of years. Organisms that exists on the skin or mucus membranes of genital area can be transmitted, as can organisms in semen, vaginal secretions or blood during sexual intercourse.
Researchers found that in states where is EPT is prohibited, the average increase in the incidence of chlamydia infection is 17.5 cases per 100,000 per year, compared with 14.1 cases in states where EPT is permissible. The benefits of expanded treatment access National health organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have endorsed EPT, but it remains underused, Mmeje added. Many insurers don’t cover medication costs for partners, and some doctors are hesitant to treat patients without an exam, citing liability concerns.
The U-M team is researching barriers to practicing EPT in Michigan, where it is allowed. Mmeje continued that in states like Michigan, there are several steps in place to learn about a patient’s partner’s allergies before prescribing medication. Laws also protect against liability. "The rate of sexually transmitted diseases in our country, particularly among youth, continues to be a significant public health concern," Mmeje said. "EPT helps circumvent some of the most common barriers to patients receiving the care they need. Our findings provide strong reasons to re-examine policies that make it difficult to access a public health measure that we know can help treat and prevent sexually transmitted diseases." The study appears in the journal Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Source-ANI
MEDINDIA




Email







