Industry-sponsored Drug Trials Portray a Tendency to Publish Favourable Results

Results of drugs tests that are sponsored by the industry portray a tendency to publish favourable results, a study has revealed.

When published results are systematically tracked for drug trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, those from industry-funded trials are the likeliest to be favourable to the drug in question, according to researchers at Children's Hospital Boston.

Premature End to Drug Tests may Not Give Out Precise Results: Study
A study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association has revealed that the results of clinical trials that ended early may not be precise and could often be exaggerated.

The researchers said there should be more public disclosure about clinical drug trials at their outset to reduce the possibility of bias in the findings.

The research team, led by Florence Bourgeois, of Children's Division of Emergency Medicine, and Kenneth Mandl, Laboratory Director in the Children's Hospital Informatics Program, reviewed 546 drug trials conducted between 2000 and 2006 and listed with ClinicalTrials.gov, a comprehensive, web-based federal registry of clinical trials.

The analysis focused on five classes of drugs: cholesterol-lowering drugs, antidepressants, antipsychotics, proton-pump inhibitors and vasodilators. The researchers scanned the medical literature for publications associated with each trial, checking four separate databases and contacting trial investigators directly if necessary.

Britney Passes Court-ordered Random Drug Tests
Britney Spears has taken and passed her court-ordered random drug tests.

Overall, allowing for a three-year lag time from the completion of the trial, two-thirds of the trials had published results.

The industry-funded trials reported positive outcomes 85 percent of the time, as compared with 50 percent for government-funded trials and 72 percent for trials funded by nonprofits or non-federal organizations.

Ingredients in Plastic Test Tubes may Skew Results of Drug Tests
Ingredients in plastic test tubes can block some biological reactions while testing the efficacy of drugs, and thereby lead researchers to bogus conclusions, according to a new study.

In addition, among the nonprofit/nonfederal trials, those that had industry contributions (nearly half) were more likely than those without to report positive outcomes (85 vs. 61 percent).

These differences were all statistically significant.

Judge Orders Spears to Undergo Random Drug Tests
Troubled pop star Britney Spears's ordeal continues. The latest is that Scott Gordon, who is the judge in her custody case, has ordered that she will have to undergo random drug and alcohol tests

The researchers acknowledge that the pharmaceutical industry was probably more selective in which trials it funded, helping to account for their greater proportion of favorable outcomes.

"Industry is very good at knowing what they want to study, and industry-sponsored studies are more efficient and well funded. But despite these potential biases, this is a stunning result," said Bourgeois, the study's first author.

The study was published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Source-ANI