About Careers Internship MedBlog Contact us
Medindia LOGIN REGISTER
Advertisement

How Can Understanding Danger Through TV Influence Our Decisions?

by Rishika Gupta on February 17, 2019 at 1:58 PM
Font : A-A+

 How Can Understanding Danger Through TV Influence Our Decisions?

Being told if something is dangerous or seeing something that can influence our decisions just as if it would have happened to us, finds a new study.

Learning what is dangerous by watching a video or being told (known as social learning) has just as strong an effect on our decision-making as the first-hand experience of danger, researchers at Karolinska Institutet in Sweden report. The results of the study, which is published in the journal PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences), can help to explain why we take irrational decisions.

Advertisement


It is easy nowadays to be exposed to unpleasant and threatening information, with accidents, terrorist attacks and natural disasters appearing, for instance, on TV, digital news sources and social media. Previous research has shown that individuals who have long exposure to news reports of a terrorist attack can develop psychological problems as serious as those afflicting people who experienced it first-hand. However, just how our actual behavior is affected by such indirect learning of danger has remained unknown.

This has now been laboratory tested in a study conducted by researchers at Karolinska Institutet, University of Amsterdam and University of Zurich. The research shows that threat learning via video or orally can affect human behavior just as strongly as personal experience.
Advertisement

In the study, three groups of participants, totaling 120 individuals, initially learned which of two neutral images was "dangerous." The first group learned through the direct experience of an electric shock, the second by watching a film of someone receiving an electric shock when looking at the image, and the third by being given oral instructions on which image to associate with an electric shock. In other words, the participants in the social learning groups (observation and oral instruction) suffered no actual physical discomfort.

The participants were then asked to repeatedly choose between the two images. Their choice could result in an electric shock, their task being to receive as few shocks as possible.

For half of the participants, the choice of image that was "dangerous" during the first part of the experiment entailed the highest risk of electric shock. This meant that their previous learning was relevant to their decisions. For the other half, the choice of image that was not "dangerous" in the initial stage entailed the highest risk of shock. This meant that their previous learning was wrong.

What the researchers found was indirect social learning (watching a film and oral information) had just as strong an effect on the participants' decisions as learning by the first-hand experience. Participants who had learned that a certain image was "dangerous" continued to avoid it, even though their choice resulted more often in an electric shock.

"The study suggests that these social ways of obtaining information can strongly influence our decision-making, even to our own detriment," says lead author Björn Lindström, a researcher at Amsterdam University and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet.

"The results can help us understand why people behave irrationally," says research group leader Andreas Olsson, senior lecturer at the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet. "They indicate that it can depend on something we've learned by watching a video clip or listening to a rumor that's misleading for the environment in which we find ourselves."

The researchers also used computational models to show that the two types of social learning influence behavior through different learning mechanisms, possibly reflecting differences in underlying brain systems. Brain activity was not measured in the study, however.

Source: Eurekalert
Advertisement

Advertisement
Advertisement

Latest Research News

Is There a Cure for Malaria Through Targeting Biological Clocks?
Malaria parasites sync their molecular rhythms with the internal 24-hour clocks of their hosts, said researchers.
Good Evening Recovery Leads to Better Work Days
A latest research suggests that the quality of a person's post-work recovery in the evening can impact their mood when they resume work the next day.
Link Between Sleep Apnea and Cognitive Decline
Researchers are working on new strategies and solutions for sleep apnea to ward off a range of health risks including cognitive decline.
Softening Stem Cells Enhances Hair Growth Potential
The scientists discovered that when the stem cells in the hair follicle are made softer, they have a higher chance of growing hair.
Potential New Strategy for Ischemic Stroke Discovered
A combinatorial therapy provided promising beneficial results among people with ischemic stroke.
View All
This site uses cookies to deliver our services.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Use  Ok, Got it. Close
×

How Can Understanding Danger Through TV Influence Our Decisions? Personalised Printable Document (PDF)

Please complete this form and we'll send you a personalised information that is requested

You may use this for your own reference or forward it to your friends.

Please use the information prudently. If you are not a medical doctor please remember to consult your healthcare provider as this information is not a substitute for professional advice.

Name *

Email Address *

Country *

Areas of Interests