An international team of global warming experts have called for new drastic conservation tactics, such as assisted migration, to save species, in the face of the growing threat of climate change.
The team of conservation scientists is from Australia, the United Kingdom and United States, including University of Texas at Austin Professor Camille Parmesan.
Cleaner Skies Paves Way for Global Warming
Cleaner skies has allowed more of the sun's rays to pierce the atmosphere, contributing to at least half the global warming that has occurred.
Advertisement
The authors argue that both the rapid rate of climate change and the presence of human-made barriers to natural movement will prevent many species from shifting where they live in response to changes in local climate.
They suggest that human-assisted translocation of individuals, often termed "assisted migration" or "assisted colonization," may be necessary to ensure colonization of new geographic regions as parts or all of the historical species' range becomes unsuitable.
![Rise in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Could Threaten a Third of World's Wildlife]( "Rise in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Could Threaten a Third of World's Wildlife")
The continuing rise in greenhouse gas emissions could threaten the survival of almost a third of the world's wildlife species, a United Nations report will say this week.
"When I first brought up this idea some 10 years ago in conservation meetings, most people were horrified," said Parmesan.
"But now, as the reality of global warming sinks in, and species are already becoming endangered and even going extinct because of climate change, I'm seeing a new willingness in the conservation community to at least talk about the possibility of helping out species by moving them around," he added.
Parmesan and her colleagues point out that assisted migration can never be a major solution for wildlife, but could conceivably be used to help a few species that biologists and the public deem to be important enough for the effort and could otherwise go extinct.
The species would need to be easy to collect, raise or move. Its habitat requirements would need to be well understood, and there would need to be viable habitat options outside of the species' current range.
In their report, the authors present a conceptual framework for just how such decisions might be made.
This framework includes fundamental biological questions which much be addressed before decisions to act can be made, such as risk of extinction if nothing is done versus risk of harm to the new community if the species is moved there.
In addition to biological considerations, their framework includes social dimensions of the issue, such as cost and inherent value people place on the target species.
"Ultimately, the decision about whether to actively assist the movement of a species into new territories will rest on ethical and aesthetic grounds as much as on hard science," said Parmesan.
"Conservation has never been an exact science, but preserving biodiversity in the face of climate change is likely to require a fundamental rethinking of what it means to 'preserve biodiversity'," she added.
Source: ANI
SRM
Rise in Greenhouse Gas Emissions Could Threaten a Third of World's Wildlife
The continuing rise in greenhouse gas emissions could threaten the survival of almost a third of the world's wildlife species, a United Nations report will say this week.
Advertisement
"When I first brought up this idea some 10 years ago in conservation meetings, most people were horrified," said Parmesan.
"But now, as the reality of global warming sinks in, and species are already becoming endangered and even going extinct because of climate change, I'm seeing a new willingness in the conservation community to at least talk about the possibility of helping out species by moving them around," he added.
Parmesan and her colleagues point out that assisted migration can never be a major solution for wildlife, but could conceivably be used to help a few species that biologists and the public deem to be important enough for the effort and could otherwise go extinct.
The species would need to be easy to collect, raise or move. Its habitat requirements would need to be well understood, and there would need to be viable habitat options outside of the species' current range.
In their report, the authors present a conceptual framework for just how such decisions might be made.
This framework includes fundamental biological questions which much be addressed before decisions to act can be made, such as risk of extinction if nothing is done versus risk of harm to the new community if the species is moved there.
In addition to biological considerations, their framework includes social dimensions of the issue, such as cost and inherent value people place on the target species.
"Ultimately, the decision about whether to actively assist the movement of a species into new territories will rest on ethical and aesthetic grounds as much as on hard science," said Parmesan.
"Conservation has never been an exact science, but preserving biodiversity in the face of climate change is likely to require a fundamental rethinking of what it means to 'preserve biodiversity'," she added.
Source: ANI
SRM
Golf Courses Could Serve as Wildlife Sanctuaries If Managed Properly
Golf courses, if properly managed, could serve as important wildlife sanctuaries, a recent study by a University of Missouri-Columbia researcher has revealed.
Advertisement
 Global Warming may Threaten Ecosystems and Water Reserves in Western USA new study has determined that global warming could lead to larger changes in snowmelt in the western United States . | Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Recommended Readings
Latest Environmental Health
Forever chemicals or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure in children, may cause them to mature later during puberty.
To achieve more substantial reductions in emissions, hospital sustainability efforts must extend their focus beyond the surface.
Most parents in Canada support moving school activities indoors to protect children from poor air quality.
The increasing demand for bioinsecticides reflects a broader shift toward sustainable agriculture, prioritizing long-term ecological health and food security.
Health-related consequences of climate change are worsening due to the rapid global heating resulting from greenhouse gas emissions, reveal experts.
