Medindia

X

Breast Cancer Detection Rate Improves With 3D Mammography

by Dr. Trupti Shirole on  December 3, 2014 at 10:25 AM Cancer News   - G J E 4
The cancer detection rate in mammography screening of women with dense breasts can be significantly increased by 30 percent with the help of digital breast tomosynthesis (also known as 3-D mammography) which addresses some of the limitations of mammography by providing 3-D views of the breast.
 Breast Cancer Detection Rate Improves With 3D Mammography
Breast Cancer Detection Rate Improves With 3D Mammography
Advertisement

Research has shown that dense breasts i.e. breasts having more of fibrous or glandular tissue than fatty tissue are more likely to develop cancer. Cancer in dense breasts can be difficult to detect on mammograms and therefore other imaging techniques like MRI and ultrasound have to be used. However, both modalities have higher rates of false-positive findings which often results in more tests and unnecessary biopsies making the entire procedure expensive to implement in high-volume screening programs.

Advertisement
The researchers from the Oslo University Hospital compared cancer detection using full-field digital mammography (FFDM) versus FFDM plus digital breast tomosynthesis in 25,547 women between the ages of 50 and 69. The American College of Radiology's Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) was used to determine breast density, with 1 being the least dense and 4 being the most dense on a scale from 1 to 4. There were 257 malignancies detected of which, 211, or 82 percent were detected with FFDM plus tomosynthesis, compared to only 163, or 63 percent, detected with FFDM alone.

Study lead author Per Skaane, M.D., Ph.D., from the Department of Radiology at Oslo University Hospital in Oslo, Norway said, "Our results show that implementation of tomosynthesis might indicate a new era in breast cancer screening."

This study was presented at the annual meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA).



Source: Medindia
Advertisement

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions
The general public has so thoroughly hoodwinked by the big business of orthodox medicine that few understand that an increase in breast cancer detection does N O T mean less deaths from breast cancer. "Better" mammography through the 3D technology leads to increased overdiagnosis and an increased radiation exposure -dense breasts or not. Meaning many more healthy women get seriously hurt, including killed, from the use of mammography and its subsequent toxic cancer treatments. There is no evidence that 3D mammography reduces mortality from breast cancer in a significant way, this is also true for standard mammography [read: 'Mammography Screening: Truth, Lies and Controversy' by Peter Gotzsche and 'The Mammogram Myth' by Rolf Hefti - more at TheMammogramMyth dot com]. There is a poor recognition among women that almost all "scientific" studies in favor of mammography are conducted and funded by people/groups with strong vested interests linked to the mammogram business. This new study is no exception: "the study's lead author, Per Skaane has reported to receiving financial support from Hologic which is a manufacturer of 3D imaging technology. The huge bias - and corruption - is obvious.
DuAlk Wednesday, December 3, 2014

You May Also Like

Advertisement
View All