Circumcision Protects Gays Only from Syphilis but Not from Other STDs

by Medindia Content Team on  October 14, 2007 at 3:41 PM Sexual Health News   - G J E 4
Circumcision Protects Gays Only from Syphilis but Not from Other STDs
Circumcision may protect gay men from the sexually transmitted infection syphilis, but a new study has found that the snip does not offer any protection from other sexually transmitted infections like HIV, gonorrhoea, chlamydia or genital warts.

For the study, researchers at the University of New South Wales inspected 1,427 homosexual men, two-thirds of whom had been circumcised, over three years with regular testing for infections.

Their analysis showed that there was no association between infection and circumcision status for any disease excluding syphilis.

Speaking at the Australasian Sexual Health Conference on the Gold Coast on Oct 11, Professor Andrew Grulich, from the National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research, said that the reasons for this were still ambiguous.

However he said that one theory for the phenomenon could be that the foreskin is particularly susceptible to this virus.

"We also believe that quite a bit of syphilis, up to a third, is being transmitted through oral sex in Australia at the moment. If the transmission of the organism is from the mouth then this is something that is different from other infections," The Age quoted Prof Grulich, as saying.

The researched also showed that syphilis numbers ascended by a third between 2004 and 2006, when 815 new infections were reported.

But despite the heave, the results were not strong enough to advocate circumcision for those at risk, the researchers said.

"Any intervention like circumcision could only be partially effective so on the basis of this research I wouldn't be out there advocating it," Prof Grulich said.

"We wouldn't want people who are circumcised wrongly thinking that they're safe from it," he added.

Source: ANI

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions
The trouble with all these headline-grabbing studies proclaiming "circumcision protects against XXX" is that a percentage reduction means nothing without knowing the rarity of the disease. Much more useful is the Number Needed to Treat. When it's going to take dozens or hundreds of circumcisions to prevent one case of the disease, and when that disease can be prevented or treated effectively and cheaply, circumcision is poor economy - especially now that science has shown what most men know, the foreskin is the most sensitive part of the penis.
guest Monday, October 15, 2007

You May Also Like