Root Canal Treatment is Still a Necessary Measure for Badly Damaged Teeth

Patients still prefer a root canal filling to save a severely damaged tooth, according to a study conducted at the University of Gothenburg.

The reason for getting a root filling is often that the soft tissue inside the tooth, the dental pulp, is inflamed or infected. The root canal treatment is carried out in stages, on several occasions.

‘Most patients choose the root canal treatment again even though pain and discomfort around the tooth are common.’

Soft parts are removed and the root canals are finally filled with a combination of a natural, rubber-like material (gutta-percha) and a kind of cement.

Despite generally good oral health, root canal treatment is still a common and necessary measure. In Sweden like in most countries, most root canal treatments are performed by general dental practitioners in the public or private sector.

A new study analyzed the various aspects of root canal treatments performed in Swedish general dental practice, with the Public Dental Service in Region V�stra G�taland as a base.

The data on a patient group initially numbering 243 were analyzed. They had all started root canal treatment at one of the 20 public dental clinics in the region. The patients were then followed up for one to three years.

Most of the root canal treatments studied were prompted by toothache in teeth with caries and large restorations, which culminated in root fillings within a year.

Molars were an exception and so only just over half of the root fillings met their purpose and, as a result, many molars had to be removed (i.e. extracted).

Root canal treatments of molars involve significantly bigger challenges than other tooth groups. So it may be important to investigate whether root canal treatments of molars should be performed to a greater extent by dentists specializing in root canal treatment.

Half of the patients stated that they had mild pain or discomfort from their root-filled tooth during the follow-up period of up to three years. Nevertheless, the great majority (87 percent) were satisfied. They did not regret their choice to get root canal treatment instead of tooth extraction.

Another component study, at six public dental clinics in Region V�stra G�taland, covered 85 patients in whom either root canal treatment was started or a tooth was removed.

An improved health-related quality of life was observed in the patients who started root canal treatment, but not in those who underwent a tooth extraction.

These studies show that the patients' quality of life benefited from root canal treatment. On the other hand, it's unclear whether the treatment is cost-effective compared with tooth removal, especially when molars are concerned.



Source: Medindia