Unlocking the Crystal Ball: Heart Failure Subtypes Helps Forecast Future Risks!

Identification of five heart failure subtypes in a recent study led by UCL researchers offers the potential to predict future risks for individual patients ().

Heart failure is an umbrella term for when the heart is unable to pump blood around the body properly. Current ways of classifying heart failure do not accurately predict how the disease is likely to progress.

Congestive Heart Failure (Congestive Cardiac Failure) Current Management
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a condition in which the heart fails to work adequately as a pump that can deliver oxygen rich blood to the body.

‘Study uncovers five heart failure subtypes that hold promise for predicting individual patient risk in the future. #Heart Failure, #Heart Failure Subtypes, #Heart Failure Risk, #Heart ’

Tweet it Now

Decoding the Puzzle

For the study, published in Lancet Digital Health, researchers looked at detailed anonymized patient data from more than 300,000 people aged 30 years or older who were diagnosed with heart failure in the UK over 20 years.

Using several machine learning methods, they identified five subtypes: early onset, late onset, atrial fibrillation related (atrial fibrillation is a condition causing an irregular heart rhythm), metabolic (linked to obesity but with a low rate of cardiovascular disease), and cardiometabolic (linked to obesity and cardiovascular disease).

The researchers found differences between the subtypes in patients’ risk of dying in the year after diagnosis. The all-cause mortality risks at one year were: early onset (20%), late-onset (46%), atrial fibrillation related (61%), metabolic (11%), and cardiometabolic (37%).

The research team also developed an app that clinicians could potentially use to determine which subtype a person with heart failure has, which may potentially improve predictions of future risk and inform discussions with patients.

Lead author Professor Amitava Banerjee (UCL Institute of Health Informatics) said: “We sought to improve how we classify heart failure, with the aim of better understanding the likely course of the disease and communicating this to patients. Currently, how the disease progresses is hard to predict for individual patients. Some people will be stable for many years, while others get worse quickly.

Cardiac Pacemaker for Abnormal Heart Rhythms – Types, Advantages & Risks
A pacemaker stimulates the heart with electrical signals when it detects arrhythmias of the heart. Pacemakers are classified based on the number of lead electrodes used and the type of pacing involved.

Identifying Five Heart Failure Subtypes

“Better distinctions between types of heart failure may also lead to more targeted treatments and may help us to think differently about potential therapies.

“In this new study, we identified five robust subtypes using multiple machine learning methods and multiple datasets.

“The next step is to see if this way of classifying heart failure can make a practical difference to patients – whether it improves predictions of risk and the quality of information clinicians provide, and whether it changes patients’ treatment. We also need to know if it would be cost-effective. The app we have designed needs to be evaluated in a clinical trial or further research, but could help in routine care.”

To avoid bias from a single machine learning method, the researchers used four separate methods to group cases of heart failure.

They applied these methods to data from two large UK primary care datasets, which were representative of the UK population as a whole and were also linked to hospital admissions and death records. (The datasets were Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and The Health Improvement Network (THIN), covering the years 1998 to 2018.)

Cardiogenic Shock - Causes, Symptoms, Diagnosis, Treatment & Prevention
Cardiogenic shock is defined as reduced cardiac output due to inability of the heart to pump adequate blood in the presence of a normal blood volume.

Revolutionizing Heart Failure Management

The research team trained the machine learning tools on segments of the data and, once they had selected the most robust subtypes, they validated these groupings using a separate dataset.

The subtypes were established based on 87 (of a possible 635) factors including age, symptoms, the presence of other conditions, the medications the patient was taking, and the results of tests (e.g., of blood pressure) and assessments (e.g., of kidney function).

The team also looked at genetic data from 9,573 individuals with heart failure from the UK Biobank study. They found a link between particular subtypes of heart failure and higher polygenic risk scores (scores of overall risk due to genes as a whole) for conditions such as hypertension and atrial fibrillation.

Reference:

Identifying subtypes of heart failure from three electronic health record sources with machine learning: an external, prognostic, and genetic validation study - (https://www.thelancet.com/journals/landig/article/PIIS2589-7500(23)00065-1/fulltext)

Source-Eurekalert