Type Of Health Insurance Determines Quality Of Cancer Care, Not Just Its Accessibility

Recent research findings by the Fox Chase Cancer Center on health insurance covers that were presented today at the American Urological Association's Annual Meeting, may have implications for a national debate on healthcare reform. The findings suggest that a person's insurance coverage can affect not just his access to cancer care but also the quality of care that is on offer.

"We discovered a discrepancy in the type of surgical treatment patients are offered based on their health insurance," says Robert G. Uzzo, MD, chairman of the department of surgery at Fox Chase and the study's lead author. His research evaluated differences in surgical treatment for kidney cancer based on a patient's health insurance carrier. The study explored this question in one specific area of medicine, but the results may have implications for other areas of medicine as well.

Universal Health Insurance Might Not Save Lives
A new analysis suggests that universal health insurance might not save many adult lives â€” or any â€” if the United States actually puts it into place.

The study results showed that kidney cancer patients with Medicare as their primary payer were more likely to have their kidney surgically removed entirely (radical nephrectomy) whereas those with private insurance were offered surgery to preserve organ function (partial nephrectomy).

"The notion that the kind of insurance you have can affect the quality of the care you receive has implications for the ongoing discussion about national health care reform. This research raises important questions for the government to consider," adds Uzzo. "As our national leaders begin to discuss health care reform, it will be important to keep in mind that who pays for the care can affect the quality of care received."

Kidney cancer is commonly treated by surgically removing the entire organ, but this is often unnecessary. Due to its technical demands, however, kidney-sparing surgery remains widely underutilized except at high-volume academic centers, where surgeons are experienced not only in resection of very complex kidney tumors but also in minimally-invasive techniques to treat patients with kidney cancer.

Family Doctors in US Fed Up With Insurance Hassles, Would Like to Call It Quits
Family doctors and internists in US fed up with insurance hassles and would like to call it quits.

There are numerous long-term health benefits to patients when the non-cancerous portion of the kidney can be preserved. These include preserving maximum kidney function, reducing the risk of dialysis down the road and a longer life expectancy.

Uzzo's study evaluated the potential impact of a patient's primary insurance status as it relates to the likelihood of the patient undergoing a radical or partial nephrectomy. The study relied on inpatient discharge data from nearly 42,000 adult patients in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania over a six-year period.

Unemployed Americans Are In The Peril Of Being Uninsured
For many unemployed workers in the United States, the scariest part of losing their job is losing their health insurance.

The study results revealed that disparities in quality of care exist. Patients 65 and over, with Medicare coverage, were significantly less likely to undergo kidney-sparing surgery for treatment of renal malignancy (kidney cancer) than patients whose primary payer was a private insurance carrier.

Big Boobs Not A Medical Condition, Hence No Insurance Cover, German Court Rules
Big boobs are not a medical condition, and hence breast reduction cannot come under insurance cover, a German court has ruled.

Source-Eurekalert
TAN