A new study published in the journal Cancer Research reveals that in a small section of metastatic melanoma patients, the immune cells that infiltrate the tumor and influence clinical outcome are activated by the microenvironment of the tumor cells .
"Our data provide a new concept in melanoma," said Nicolas van Baren, M.D., Ph.D., a clinical and laboratory investigator at the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, the de Duve Institute and the Cancer Centre of Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc in Brussels, Belgium. "Before we began our study, it was thought that immune responses were triggered in specialized structures known as lymph nodes. Lymphocytes, which are an important subset of immune cells, became activated in lymph nodes and then migrated via the blood to the tumor."
Results of his study showed an alternative path whereby naive lymphocytes were activated locally in the tumor microenvironment. "Fundamental knowledge like this is crucial as we seek to understand how tumors escape antitumor immune responses and how we can develop approaches to counter this," he said.
Ectopic lymphoid structures have also been observed in some malignant tumors, including breast, lung and colorectal tumors, but not melanoma. In some studies, their presence has been linked to improved prognosis.
Van Baren and colleagues observed ectopic lymphoid structures in seven out of 29 skin metastases from patients with melanoma. In contrast, no primary melanoma samples examined contained complete ectopic lymphoid structures. However, some of them hosted small blood vessels that are associated with these structures.
Further analyses indicated that the ectopic lymphoid structures were functional, as features indicative of activation of the B cell lymphocyte subset were observed.
"It is important to have established that immune responses can be generated locally, at least in skin metastases," said van Baren. "In fact, this last point, that we detected functional lymphoid structures in skin metastases and not in primary tumors, is extremely intriguing. We think that understanding the reasons for this difference will be highly informative in determining how antimelanoma immune responses develop during disease progression."
The sample size was too small to allow the researchers to draw clinically meaningful conclusions. "Nonetheless, it will be important to look at this moving forward, as it is not yet clear whether these structures are good for the patient and bad for the tumor or good for the tumor and bad for the patient. At this point, there is no indication either way, and we could provide a speculative argument for either."