This truly remains a secret till date as researchers who tried to establish a definite cause found the answer for only one in every five infants they studied.

TOP INSIGHT
Few of the possible causes of birth defects were stemmed down to chromosomal or genetic conditions accounted for 94.4%, environmental (teratogenic) exposure for 4.1%, and conditions associated with twins.
In the US alone, the cost of care during a single year (2004) was estimated at $2.6bn (£2bn, €2.4bn), not accounting for the considerable indirect and lifelong personal and societal costs. In the US, birth defects are also the leading cause of infant mortality and in 2013 were associated with 4,778 deaths, one in every five deaths in the first year of life.
While studies have shown associations between risk factors (such as maternal diabetes, smoking and obesity) and birth defects, translating these associations to actual causes has been difficult.
So a team of researchers based at the University of Utah School of Medicine set out to establish causes (etiology) of major birth defects in children born from 2005 to 2009 using Utah's population based surveillance system.
They identified 5,504 cases among 270,878 births (a prevalence of 2%). Definite cause was assigned in 20.2% (1,114) of these cases: chromosomal or genetic conditions accounted for 94.4% (1,052), environmental (teratogenic) exposure for 4.1%, and conditions associated with twins for 1.4%.
These findings underscore the gaps in our knowledge regarding the causes of birth defects, say the authors. For the causes that are known, such as smoking or diabetes, assigning causation in individual cases remains challenging.
For the causes that are still unknown, they say better strategies are needed, such as greater collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and epidemiologists; and better ways to objectively measure fetal exposures.
Source-Eurekalert
MEDINDIA




Email










