According to new research from the University of Michigan, scoring methods commonly used to evaluate Newborn Intensive Care Units (NICU) are inconsistent.
The research published last week in the journal Pediatrics compared 10 well-known scores that have been developed to evaluate NICUs. The researchers found more differences than similarities.
Automating Sedation in Intensive Care Units Being Probed in Research
Automating the management of sedation in hospital intensive care units (ICUs) is being probed by researchers
Advertisement
"This raises the question: do these scores level the playing field well enough, or are scores still somewhat unfair? And what more can we learn about the major causes of mortality for infants in neonatal intensive care? By doing research to improve tools to adjust hospital scores, we believe that it will be possible to improve care for these very vulnerable infants," says Stephen W. Patrick, M.D., M.P.H., M.S., lead author of the study and a fellow in the University of Michigan's division of neonatal and perinatal medicine at C.S. Mott Children's Hospital.
Parents and payers want to be able to know which hospitals do the best job taking care of newborns - especially newborns with life-threatening illness, Patrick says. Currently, much effort is put forth to help the public understand the quality of care that hospitals are providing, using scores like these applied to NICUs.
![Nearly a Quarter of Scottish Intensive Care Unit Patients Suffer from Alcohol Problems]( "Nearly a Quarter of Scottish Intensive Care Unit Patients Suffer from Alcohol Problems")
Alcohol related problems are becoming a major concern for Scottish health authorities
Patrick and his U-M co-authors Matthew M. Davis, M.D., M.A.P.P., associate professor in the Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit and Robert Schumacher, M.D., professor of neonatal-perinatal medicine, looked at 10 different neonatal mortality risk adjustment scores, including the Clinical Risk Index for Babies and the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development "calculator." The scores differed substantively in intended purpose, in areas like research, clinical management or performance.
The scores are also inconsistent in timing of data collection and inclusion of co-morbidity indicators.
"Giving scores to hospitals is trickier than it may seem - largely because some hospitals take care of especially high numbers of very sick babies, and their scores can look worse than hospitals taking care of healthier babies. In other words, hospitals with sicker infants are taking a harder 'test,' says Patrick. "
The researchers stress that an evaluation or scoring process is essential, but more meaningful comparisons are needed.
"To make fairer comparisons, researchers have developed different 'risk adjustment' techniques over the last 20 years. But our research shows that these adjusted scores may not always level the playing field when comparing one hospital to another. Moreover, some of these tools are being used in ways they were not originally intended. We hope additional research in this area can both improve the care for patients and allow for reliable comparisons of institutions," says Schumacher.
Source: Eurekalert
Nearly a Quarter of Scottish Intensive Care Unit Patients Suffer from Alcohol Problems
Alcohol related problems are becoming a major concern for Scottish health authorities
Advertisement
Patrick and his U-M co-authors Matthew M. Davis, M.D., M.A.P.P., associate professor in the Child Health Evaluation and Research Unit and Robert Schumacher, M.D., professor of neonatal-perinatal medicine, looked at 10 different neonatal mortality risk adjustment scores, including the Clinical Risk Index for Babies and the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development "calculator." The scores differed substantively in intended purpose, in areas like research, clinical management or performance.
The scores are also inconsistent in timing of data collection and inclusion of co-morbidity indicators.
"Giving scores to hospitals is trickier than it may seem - largely because some hospitals take care of especially high numbers of very sick babies, and their scores can look worse than hospitals taking care of healthier babies. In other words, hospitals with sicker infants are taking a harder 'test,' says Patrick. "
The researchers stress that an evaluation or scoring process is essential, but more meaningful comparisons are needed.
"To make fairer comparisons, researchers have developed different 'risk adjustment' techniques over the last 20 years. But our research shows that these adjusted scores may not always level the playing field when comparing one hospital to another. Moreover, some of these tools are being used in ways they were not originally intended. We hope additional research in this area can both improve the care for patients and allow for reliable comparisons of institutions," says Schumacher.
Source: Eurekalert
Despite Low Staffing Levels Children's Intensive Care Units Performing Well
In a new audit report published today by the University of Leeds and the University of Leicester, standards of care in children's intensive care units come under scrutiny.
Advertisement
 Pediatric Intensive Care Unit‘s Beds May Well Be Used More Ably With Enhanced FlowA dear resource, the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with limited number of beds and resource-intensive services, serves as a key part of patient flow. | Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Recommended Readings
Latest Child Health News
Side-effects of valproate drug taken during pregnancy, enhance the expression of Rnf146 gene, causing autism spectrum disorder in fetus.
Children with amblyopia or lazy eye who underwent digital vision training, showed no appreciable improvement in their eyesight.
In 2022, over 20% of children worldwide lacked adequate calories for growth, with 45+ million showing wasting (underweight for height).
After PCV7 licensure, pneumococcal infection rates in children aged 5+ with sickle cell disease significantly decreased.
Breast milk concentration of certain key proteins indicates abundance of healthy bacteria in babies' guts.
