Mom's exposed to forest fire smoke during pregnancy are more likely to have stunted children, reports a new study.
Forest fires are more harmful than previously imagined, causing stunted growth in children who were exposed to smoke while in the womb, according to new research from Duke University and the National University of Singapore.
The authors found prenatal exposure to haze from forest fires led to a statistically significant 1.3-inch decrease in expected height at age 17.
"While previous research has drawn attention to the deaths caused by the forest fires, we show that survivors also suffer large and irreversible losses," they wrote. "Human capital is lost along with natural capital because of haze exposure."
"This disadvantage is impossible to reverse," said co-author Subhrendu Pattanayak of the Duke Sanford School of Public Policy.
After conducting cost-benefit analyses, the authors concluded the long-term human capital losses exceed the short-term financial benefits associated with using fire to clear land for the oil palm industry.
"There are ways to eliminate these fires that are not that expensive, so this seems a very shortsighted way to develop and grow an economy," Pattanayak said.
The study, "Seeking natural capital projects: Forest fires, haze, and early-life exposure in Indonesia," by Pattanayak and Jie-Sheng Tan-Soo of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy appears in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
The study combined data on mothers' exposure to widespread Indonesian forest fires in 1997 with longitudinal data on nutritional outcomes, genetic inheritance, climatic factors, and various sociodemographic factors.
In 1997, which was an abnormally dry year, fires set to clear land primarily for oil palm plantations spread and burned out of control. Between August and October, when the fires were most intense, they engulfed 11 million hectares (27.2 million acres), causing massive exposure to unhealthy levels of air pollution. That year, about 25 percent of global carbon emissions were generated by this single event.
The study examined data for 560 affected children who were in utero or in the first six months of life at the time of the fires. Their health outcomes and household characteristics were drawn from 1997, 2000, 2007, and 2014 rounds of the Indonesian Family Life Survey.
The authors conducted a series of robustness checks and confirmed their findings were not driven by high levels of pollution in later years, geographic factors, an indirect effect of severe air pollution on a family's ability to work and to earn income, or overall reductions in food consumption during the months of the forest fires.
After documenting the negative effects of the fires on health and well-being, the authors went on to conduct a series of cost-benefit analyses to determine whether spending to avoid such outcomes would be fiscally justifiable.
Collectively, these analyses showed that the social net benefits from using fire to clear for oil palm are lower than the social net benefits of mechanical clearing, stronger enforcement of fire bans and better fire suppression efforts.
Because oil palm growers would be unwilling to bear the higher costs of mechanical clearing, the authors recommend Indonesia pursue more effective fire bans, fire suppression, and moratoriums on oil palm to protect natural and human capital.