Lindsay Sobin, M.D., and Parul Goyal, M.D., M.B.A., of the SUNY Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, N.Y.
Patients use the Internet as a resource for health care information. Physician-rating websites are becoming increasingly prevalent. However, many physicians view these rating websites unfavorably.
How the Study Was Conducted
: The authors sought to examine online ratings for otolaryngologists. The names of academic program faculty members in the Northeast were compiled and 281 faculty members from 25 programs were identified. Of them, 266 otolaryngologists had a profile on Healthgrades and 247 had a profile on Vitals, two physician-rating websites.
Of those otolaryngologists with profiles, 186 (69.9 percent) and 202 (81.8 percent) had patient reviews on Healthgrades and Vitals, respectively. The average score was 4.4 of 5.0 on Healthgrades and 3.4 of 4.0 on Vitals. On Vitals, 179 profiles had comments, 49 comments were deemed negative and 138 otolaryngologists had at least one negative comment.
"The information presented in this study is related to subjective perceptions and ratings. We are not suggesting that the rating information correlates with the quality of care or overall physician quality. This is an intrinsic limitation of the data, but these data are being used by patients to potentially make decisions about their health care professionals. For these reasons, these ratings hold weight, even if they are not good measures of overall physician quality." (JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
. Published online May 29, 2014. doi:10.1001/.jamaoto.2014.818. Available pre-embargo to the media atmedia.jamanetwork.com.)
Please see article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
To contact corresponding author Parul Goyal, M.D., M.B.A., call 315-254-2030 or email email@example.com. An author podcast with Lindsay Sobin, M.D., will be available on the JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery