Four organizations claimed to help cancer patients and allegedly drained off more than $187 million to pay for lavish salaries, luxury vacations and other goods.
The organizations are the Cancer Fund of America (CFA), Cancer Support Services (CSS), the Children's Cancer Fund of America (CCFOA) and the Breast Cancer Society (BCS).
Cell Phone Radiation and Cancer - Unveiling the Link
Scared after hearing all the harmful effects of cell phone use? Read on to find more about what cell phone radiation actually does and how you can cut down on the exposure.
Advertisement
The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and law enforcement officials from all 50 US states charged the organizations with being "sham charities" that stuffed the vast majority of donations in the pockets of directors, family, friends and fundraisers, according to documents filed in the southwest state of Arizona.
"This is one of the largest actions brought to date by enforcers against charity fraud," the FTC said in a statement.
The organizations, all led by relatives and their close friends, claimed that the funds would be put towards cancer patients' medication and hospital bills. However, the funding was used for lucrative employment for family members and friends in a scheme that began in 1987. Professional fundraisers often received 85 percent or more of every donation. It alleged that the donations were spent on cars, trips, luxury cruises, college tuition, gym memberships, jet ski outings, sporting event and concert tickets, and dating site memberships.
To hide the expenses and high salaries, the organizations inflated their revenue by reporting in-kind donations totaling more than $223 million made in other countries, but were in fact only pass-through agents for those goods.
Meanwhile only three percent of donations made it to cancer patients.
"Cancer is a debilitating disease that impacts millions of Americans and their families every year. The defendants' egregious scheme effectively deprived legitimate cancer charities and cancer patients of much-needed funds and support," said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.
Source: Medindia
The organizations, all led by relatives and their close friends, claimed that the funds would be put towards cancer patients' medication and hospital bills. However, the funding was used for lucrative employment for family members and friends in a scheme that began in 1987. Professional fundraisers often received 85 percent or more of every donation. It alleged that the donations were spent on cars, trips, luxury cruises, college tuition, gym memberships, jet ski outings, sporting event and concert tickets, and dating site memberships.
Advertisement
To hide the expenses and high salaries, the organizations inflated their revenue by reporting in-kind donations totaling more than $223 million made in other countries, but were in fact only pass-through agents for those goods.
Meanwhile only three percent of donations made it to cancer patients.
"Cancer is a debilitating disease that impacts millions of Americans and their families every year. The defendants' egregious scheme effectively deprived legitimate cancer charities and cancer patients of much-needed funds and support," said Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.
Source: Medindia
Australian Health Blogger Belle Gibson Admits Lying About Conquering Brain Cancer
She had claimed to have used natural therapy to cure brain cancer. Gibson became so famous that Penguin published her cookbook and Apple picked-up her app.
Advertisement
 | Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Recommended Readings
Latest Cancer News
Engaging in regular exercise could significantly enhance the quality of life for individuals facing metastatic breast cancer.
Drugs known as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, prescribed for type 2 diabetes, could lower the likelihood of developing colorectal cancer.
Researchers found a pathway linked to allergies that, when blocked, triggers antitumor immunity in lung cancer mouse models.
The occurrence of epimutations early in pregnancy challenges traditional theories related to carcinogenesis and the risk of developing breast cancer.
More affected relatives, higher lung cancer risk; participants with affected mothers or siblings faced increased risk.