New HIV Vaccine Strategy to Enhance the Immune Response

"It's like physical training--you start off weak and then keep going back to the gym to get stronger," says Kimberly Cirelli, Ph.D., a postdoctoral researcher at LJI and first author of the study. "The germinal center is the gym and the B cells have to repeatedly go back to undergo rounds of selection to get better binding."

Advertisement

To beat HIV, B cells generate antibodies that bind to the machinery on the virus that launches the infection. But HIV is a tough opponent--its outer protein shell that can be recognized by antibodies is littered with decoy sites that confuse the immune system. B and TFH cells work toward targeting the decoy sites, not realizing that the antibodies will fail.

"The vast majority of antibodies just bind the wrong places on the virus--so they're useless," says Crotty.

For the new study, Crotty and his colleagues compared three vaccine dosage strategies to see if one might stand a better chance of prompting neutralizing antibody production. Study collaborators at Yerkes National Primate Research Center tested the strategies in rhesus monkeys, the best animal model for studying how the human immune system reacts to HIV.

But first, the team needed a window into the immune system. The researchers took advantage of a new technique, adopted recently in the Crotty lab, to repeatedly extract small samples of germinal center cells from the lymph nodes. This let them see antibody refinement occurring in real time while leaving the lymph nodes intact and able to keep improving the B cell response in the germinal center.

The researchers tested three immunization strategies: a traditional vaccine where the vaccine was delivered with one big shot; an 'osmotic pump' strategy, where an implant somewhat like a time-release drug pill slowly delivered the vaccine; and an escalating dose strategy, where the animals were given partial doses of the vaccine every-other day for 12 days.

As Crotty puts it, the traditional vaccine led to a predictably "lousy" immune response dominated by non-neutralizing antibodies. Then the experiment got interesting. To everyone's surprise, the two slow release strategies led to not just more antibodies but better antibodies.

The slow release strategies appeared to keep more B cells activated for longer, giving them time to work with TFH cells and refine antibody strength and binding. As time went on, these B cells actually began producing neutralizing antibodies that could bind to important parts of HIV's structure.

"It was a beautiful thing to get to see what was happening in the lymph nodes over time," says Crotty.

The study shows that changing a vaccine's delivery, not the vaccine itself, can have dramatic results on its success. "If you change the way the immune system sees viral proteins, it really can make a dramatic difference," Crotty says.

The next step in this research is to design delivery methods practical for clinical use around the world. The researchers believe methods like degradable capsules could be less cumbersome for patients than osmotic pumps or multiple vaccine doses.

"We might need to think more outside the box to develop vaccines against harder-to neutralize pathogens, including HIV," says Cirelli, who in addition to working in the Crotty lab at LJI is a member of the Scripps Research's Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology and Immunogen Discovery (Scripps CHAVI-ID).



Source: Eurekalert