About Careers Internship MedBlog Contact us

Needless Regulation Harming Clinical Research in the UK: Experts

by VR Sreeraman on October 18, 2008 at 5:28 PM
 Needless Regulation Harming Clinical Research in the UK: Experts

Increasing bureaucracy is the biggest single threat to clinical research in the UK and urgent action needs to be taken, argue experts on bmj.com today.

European legislation introduced in 2001 was intended to simplify and harmonise the regulation of trials across the European Union. But it has led to long delays in approval, is "poorly coordinated, lacks inconsistency at all levels, and at times is completely illogical", write Professors Morris Brown and Paul Stewart.


Because of the increasingly complicated and time-consuming approval process, the UK has fallen from being one of the most attractive places for the pharmaceutical industry to undertake clinical trials to one of the least attractive, warn the authors.

Main concerns of the authors include the lengthy application process, paperwork can take up to 40 hours to complete, the inconsistencies and delays in the review process, and the lack of clarity about what requires ethical approval.

According to the authors, another key problem is the ineffectiveness of the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approval process—the application is difficult to complete, cannot be submitted online and is sometimes lost by the MHRA.

The MHRA was set up to investigate new medicinal products, but its extended responsibility to approve all clinical trials in the UK has been counterproductive, say the authors.

"The process adds long delay for no perceived benefit. No improvement in patient safety has been demonstrated as a consequence of the extra tier of bureaucracy for such studies", say the authors, "On the contrary, the MHRA failed to prevent the TeGenero disaster at Northwick Park or acknowledge its failure".

So what needs to be done?

The recently formed National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) has already begun a "bureaucracy busting" mission, say the authors, but they outline a number of recommendations to reduce research bureaucracy.

For example, they suggest a single and simple web based submission form for all research studies, rather than a different form for every funding and governance organisation. In addition, they suggest a national and consistent ethical review process to replace the current "postcode lottery", and an automatic grading of applications which would make patient safety "self evident".

They conclude by calling for the MHRA to concentrate on its primary responsibility, and ensure that medicines work and are safe.

Source: BMJ
Font : A-A+



Latest General Health News

Wild Poliovirus Resurfaces in Pakistan
The Pakistan Ministry has announced the commencement of a nationwide polio vaccination campaign beginning on October 2, aiming to immunize more children.
US Woman Loses All Limbs in Fish-Related Bacterial Outbreak
In a tragic incident, a woman in the US experienced the loss of all her limbs as a result of a bacterial outbreak linked to the consumption of contaminated fish.
NIH Launches the First In-Human Universal Flu Vaccine Trial
FluMos-v2, a unique universal influenza vaccine candidate, undergoing a phase 1 trial at NIH, increases recipients' immunity against many influenza viruses.
Global Polio Eradication Initiative Assesses Vaccination Strategies in Pakistan
In Pakistan, the polio campaign focuses on more than 270,000 children under the age of five years, residing in areas with insufficient vaccine coverage.
Diagnostic Errors: The Rocky Road to Life-threatening Health Complications
Dangers of Wrong Diagnosis: Diagnostic errors in healthcare can increase the risk of permanent disabilities and deaths.
View All
This site uses cookies to deliver our services.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Use  Ok, Got it. Close
Greetings! How can I assist you?MediBot

Needless Regulation Harming Clinical Research in the UK: Experts Personalised Printable Document (PDF)

Please complete this form and we'll send you a personalised information that is requested

You may use this for your own reference or forward it to your friends.

Please use the information prudently. If you are not a medical doctor please remember to consult your healthcare provider as this information is not a substitute for professional advice.

Name *

Email Address *

Country *

Areas of Interests