Time commitment is considered to be one of the barriers to getting people to use more active forms of transportation, revealed study.
When researchers asked participants in a study to estimate how long it would take them to bike or walk to a common location in town, they found that the majority of people estimated incorrectly. Most of the participants thought it would take longer than it actually did. Melissa Bopp, associate professor of kinesiology, Penn State, said the results help the researchers better understand the barriers keeping people from walking or biking, sometimes referred to as "active travel," instead of using a car.
"People in general aren't very good at estimating how long it's going to take to get somewhere," Bopp said. "That's problematic when you're trying to get someone to walk or bike somewhere. Traveling by foot or bike has a lot of benefits, but not a lot of people do it. They may think they can't do it because it's too far and it'll take too long, when it turns out it's really not." But despite these advantages, most people still commute by car -- according to the researchers, more than 90 percent of Americans drive a car to work. Bopp said that the key to getting people to travel more actively was to to learn more about why people don't walk or bike more often in the first place. "We wanted to look at people's knowledge, attitudes and beliefs, because those are things we can try to change. I can't change your age, but I can change your knowledge," Bopp said. "For example, people who aren't familiar with walk or bike travel tend to assume you use the same route you would drive, which might be along a busy road. Meanwhile, in actuality, there's a perfectly lovely bike path that only crosses that busy road once. That's a knowledge gap we can fix."
Students were a little better at estimating travel times -- about 55 percent incorrectly estimated walking times and about 43 percent misestimated biking times. Almost everyone who was not accurate overestimated the travel time. Bopp said they also found several characteristics that could predict if someone was more likely to be "discordant," or likely to estimate travel times incorrectly. Faculty and staff who thought parking was more available and accessible were more discordant, and women were more likely to be more discordant than men. Bopp said another predictor was self-efficacy, or self-confidence. "For faculty and staff, self-confidence for walking and biking in town or on campus was a huge predictor," Bopp said. "We can have all the bike lanes in the world, but if you don't feel confident to go out there and bike, then you're not going to do it. But luckily, self-confidence is a targetable thing. Providing education, encouragement and resources can help with that. There are urban biking classes you can take, for example."
In contrast, people who rode a bike or walked more often were more likely to accurately predict travel times. While the study looked at people predicting travel times when they shared a common destination, Dangaia Sims, who worked on the study while earning her doctorate in kinesiology at Penn State, said the results -- recently published in Transportmetrica A: Transport Science -- also have broader implications.
"Experience with active transportation will usually give someone a better understanding of how long it actually takes to commute by bike or on foot," Sims said. "While efforts can be taken to better educate the general public of how long it actually takes to commute somewhere via active modes, we recommend that they actually try it out for themselves. Often people indicate that the reason they choose to drive is that its much quicker than walking or biking when, in reality, that may not be the case."