Global platelet reactivity is more effective than responsiveness to clopidogrel in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients at high risk of ischemic events, according to research presented at the ESC Congress today. The results from the RECLOSE 2-ACS study were presented by Dr Rossella Marcucci from Italy.
The Responsiveness to Clopidogrel and Stent thrombosis 2 - ACS (RECLOSE 2-ACS) study is a prospective, observational, referral center cohort study of 1,789 patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the Division of Cardiology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is the cornerstone of therapy in these patients to improve prognosis and reduce adverse cardiovascular events, stent thrombosis and cardiovascular death.
A number of genetic and acquired conditions are associated with a high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel. Carriers of a genetic variant (the CYP2C19*2 polymorphism), diabetics, older patients, females and patients with a reduced renal and cardiac function have a higher risk of maintaining a high platelet reactivity on clopidogrel. In addition, the concomitant use of drugs such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is associated with a reduced metabolization of clopidogrel (which is a prodrug and needs to be metabolized to the active drug by the liver) and a high risk of high platelet reactivity.
The aim of the current study was to evaluate whether a high platelet reactivity due to nonresponsiveness to aspirin could also identify ACS patients at high risk of ischemic events. The investigators also evaluated whether the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel nonresponsiveness could identify high risk patients more effectively than one measure alone.
The researchers measured platelet reactivity in response to aspirin and clopidogrel in patients enrolled in the RECLOSE 2-ACS study. They found that approximately 20% of patients had a high platelet reactivity to aspirin and were therefore nonresponders. These patients had a significantly higher prevalence of an ischemic event or cardiac death at the 2 year follow-up (major adverse cardiac events [MACE]: Hazard Ratio [HR]=1.4 [1.0-1.8], p<0.04; Cardiac death: HR=1.7 [1.2-2.6],p=0.004).
The researchers calculated the net reclassification index (NRI), which is a method to define whether the addition of a new parameter increases the predictive value. Dr Marcucci said: "We found that adding the response to aspirin to the response to clopidogrel enabled us to recognize a higher number of patients at risk of ischemic events and cardiac events."
Approximately 9% of patients had high platelet reactivity (ie were nonresponders) to both clopidogrel and aspirin. This phenotype is known as global high platelet reactivity (GHPR).
GHPR was significantly associated with cardiovascular ischemic events and cardiac death in a Cox regression analysis (MACE: HR=1.5[1.0-2.2], p=0.02; cardiac death: HR= 1.9[1.2-3.2], p=0.008). The analysis was adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, history of myocardial infarction, serum creatinine higher than 1.5 mg/dl, left ventricular ejection fraction <40%, Killip class III or IV at admission, 3-vessel coronary disease, use of drug eluting stents, total stent length, multivessel PCI and use of abciximab.
The figures below show that patients with GHPR have lower survival rates from MACE (p=0.001) and cardiac death (p<0.0001) than patients without GHPR.
Dr Marcucci said: "These results show that global high platelet reactivity is the most effective parameter for identifying ACS patients at high risk of ischemic events."
She added: "This shifts the focus of risk stratification from response to clopidogrel to assessing response to both clopidogrel and aspirin. Responsiveness to both antiplatelet drugs should be assessed in all patients with ACS in order to identify and reduce their risk of ischemic events."