An observational study has found that using estradiol by post menopausal women leads to lower risk of developing blood clots in leg veins (deep vein thrombosis) and clots in the lungs (pulmonary emboli) compared to use of conjugated equine estrogens.
According to a joint University of Washington (UW)-Group Health study in JAMA Internal Medicine, women patients of Group Heath who were prescribed a generic version of estradiol—a bio-equivalent estrogen—experienced fewer adverse vascular events than did those prescribed conjugated equine estrogens, a patented drug marketed as Premarin.
"Although oral estrogens are effective for managing menopause symptoms, not enough is known about the cardiovascular safety of different oral hormone therapy products relative to each other," said first author Nicholas L. Smith, PhD. He is a professor of epidemiology at the UW School of Public Health, the director of the Veterans Affairs (VA) Seattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center (ERIC) at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System, and an affiliate investigator at Group Health Research Institute.
- The risk of having a heart attack was somewhat—but not significantly—higher in women using oral conjugated equine estrogens than in those using oral estradiol.
- No difference was seen in the risk of stroke.
This project, part of the Heart and Vascular Health study, involved 384 Group Health members, aged 30-79, who were taking oral estrogen for menopause symptoms from 2003 through 2009. On February 1, 2005, Group Health's formulary switched its preferred oral estrogen from conjugated equine estrogens to estradiol. The Heart and Vascular Health study is a case-control study, where Group Health members who develop cardiovascular events are matched with control members who do not.