Specialists revealed that flaws in computer modelling led to apocalyptic forecasts of how the deadly Ebola virus would spread in West Africa. Many of the models were off-the-shelf software that failed to take into account complexities and uncertainties in the way the disease spread in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia, they said on Tuesday.
"In the early days of the Ebola outbreak, a lot of people got into the forecasting business," said Aaron King of the University of Michigan, who led a probe into why so many predictions turned out to be wildly wrong. "They did it using appealingly simple mathematical models, and the result was a series of warnings that alerted the world, quite rightly to the seriousness of the situation. But in the end, most of those predictions turned out to be overstated."
Sierra Leone Ends Its Three-Day Anti-Ebola Lockdown
During the lock-down period, almost 26,000 volunteers went door-to-door to check for sick people and raise awareness about the disease.
Last September, the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), using computer modelling, said that Liberia and Sierra Leone could see up to 1.4 million Ebola cases by January 2015 without a major intervention. An international aid operation cranked into higher gear, and the relentless growth of Ebola cases stopped.
WHO Reiterates Support Towards Defeating Ebola, Wants Zero Deaths
The 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa is the longest, largest, deadliest, and the most complex in history with more than 22,000 cases and 9,162 deaths.
"Those predictions proved to be wrong, and it was not only because of the successful intervention in West Africa," King said. "It's also because the methods people were using to make the forecasts were inappropriate."
The probe, published in the British scientific journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B, pointed the finger at so-called deterministic models. Unlike rival software, known as stochastic models, these do not take into account random elements and uncertainty, including variables in how the virus is transmitted from person to person.
Many Ebola forecasters used these deterministic models to crunch out forecasts, using as a baseline the number of cases that had accumulated since the start of the outbreak. The result was that predictions were overblown, and the world was not told of the uncertainties in them, the study said.
"Deterministic models are easier and faster to work with, and the results look pretty good," King said in a press release issued by his university. "But when you use them, it's a double whammy. Not only are you wrong, you are very sure that you are right."
Source: AFP
Owing to Fears of Ebola Virus Comeback, 45-Day 'Health Emergency' Declared in Guinea
To stem the spread of Ebola, Alpha Conde, the Guinean President, declared a 45-day health emergency in five regions in the west and southwest of nation.
 Sierra Leone Launches Campaign for Zero Ebola InfectionsIt means that for the next three days, six million Sierra Leoneans will stay at home, to push for 'zero Ebola infection'. | Advertisement
|
Recommended Reading
Latest Tropical Disease News
