There are no current standardized fasting protocols for patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Hence a new study aimed to compare safety and outcomes of a non-fasting strategy to current standard fasting protocol and suggests that cardiac catheterization procedure should be more patient-centered.

TOP INSIGHT
No restriction of oral intake deemed just as safe as traditional 'NPO' strategy in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
"This study really challenges one of the established practices of having the patients fast prior to a non-emergent cardiac catheterization procedure," said Abhishek Mishra, MD, lead study investigator and cardiologist at Vidant Heart & Vascular Institute-North Carolina. "This practice has been in place for [several] decades without having any actual evidence to support it. With the advancement of procedural technology and moderate conscious sedation, the perceived risk of complications has significantly reduced," Mishra continued.
The SF group was instructed to be NPO after midnight but could have clear liquids up to two hours before the procedure. The NF group had no restriction on oral intake, irrespective of the time of the cardiac catheterization. Primary outcomes included a composite of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), peri-procedural hypotension, aspiration pneumonia, nausea/vomiting, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia. Secondary outcomes included assessment of patient satisfaction, in-patient mortality and total cost of the index hospitalization.
A total of 599 patients (outpatients: n=305, inpatients: n=294) were randomized. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. As compared to the SF group (n=306), the NF group (n=293) had similar rates of the primary outcome (9.8% vs. 11.3%, respectively, p=0.65) and was non-inferior to the fasting strategy at a threshold of 0.059. There was no significant difference in incidence of CIN (1.6% vs. 2.4%), peri-procedural hypotension (1.6% vs. 2.0%), aspiration pneumonia (none vs. 0.7%), nausea/vomiting (3.6% vs 5.1%), hyperglycemia (3.3% vs. 1.4%), or hypoglycemia (1.0% in both). More than 99% of patients of both groups were discharged alive. There was no significant difference with regards to the patient satisfaction score and 30-day mortality. [fasting vs NF: 4.38±0.90 vs. 4.49±0.77 and 1.3% vs. 2.4% respectively, p=ns for both]. Cost of hospitalization was also similar in both groups.
"We hope that the findings of this study help make the cardiac catheterization procedure more 'patient-centered'," stated Mishra. "The current fasting practice does result in more discomfort and frustration for the patients who may sometimes end up waiting several hours longer than the planned 6 hours of fasting. Imagine a diabetic patient who is fasting for a procedure overnight, only to realize that there has been an emergent procedure scheduled prior to him at the last minute, and he may end up having the procedure later in the day when he may already be fasting for nearly 14+ hours. Also, patient contentedness being a focus of healthcare in current practice, this study is an important step to maximize patient comfort in a safe manner."
Source-Eurekalert
MEDINDIA




Email










