Showing how folks infer various types of utterances offers more clarity on how literal and contextual meaning is distinguished a new linguistic study.
Within linguistics and philosophy, two types of utterance meaning have traditionally been distinguished - semantic meaning, based on the literal meaning of the words themselves, and pragmatic meaning, based on how the sentence is used in a particular context.
Languages are Undergoing a Global Extinction Crisis, Says Linguistics Expert
The world's native languages are dying out at an unprecedented rate, taking with them irreplaceable knowledge about the natural world, according to a National Geographic study.
Advertisement
Over the past decade, there has been an explosion of empirical work exploring the line between these two types of meaning.
However, few researchers have explored whether and under what conditions speakers can reliably isolate semantic meaning from pragmatic meaning.
![Researchers Solve the Puzzle of How the Brain Strings Words into Sentences]( "Researchers Solve the Puzzle of How the Brain Strings Words into Sentences")
Scientists are still struggling to understand the highly complex processes necessary to comprehend and produce language in the brain
The new study, authored by Ryan Doran, Gregory Ward, Meredith Larson, Yaron McNabb, and Rachel E. Baker from Northwestern University, does just this.
Using a novel paradigm in which participants assume the point of view of a literal-minded third person, Literal Lucy, the researchers tested whether speakers were able to tease apart semantic meaning from pragmatic meaning.
Participants read through short vignettes and determined whether sentences containing certain key phrases like gradable adjectives, cardinals, quantifiers, were literally still true even in contexts that favoured a more natural, pragmatic interpretation.
Their study found that speakers were in fact able to tease apart pragmatic elements of meaning from semantic ones but that the ability to do so is sensitive both to the particular type of phrase used in the sentence as well as the point of view a speaker adopts.
By adopting a third-party perspective and relying upon their folk notion of interpreting literally, speakers were able to distinguish between semantic and pragmatic meaning more reliably.
The study will be published in the scholarly journal Language.
Source: ANI
Researchers Solve the Puzzle of How the Brain Strings Words into Sentences
Scientists are still struggling to understand the highly complex processes necessary to comprehend and produce language in the brain
Advertisement
The new study, authored by Ryan Doran, Gregory Ward, Meredith Larson, Yaron McNabb, and Rachel E. Baker from Northwestern University, does just this.
Using a novel paradigm in which participants assume the point of view of a literal-minded third person, Literal Lucy, the researchers tested whether speakers were able to tease apart semantic meaning from pragmatic meaning.
Participants read through short vignettes and determined whether sentences containing certain key phrases like gradable adjectives, cardinals, quantifiers, were literally still true even in contexts that favoured a more natural, pragmatic interpretation.
Their study found that speakers were in fact able to tease apart pragmatic elements of meaning from semantic ones but that the ability to do so is sensitive both to the particular type of phrase used in the sentence as well as the point of view a speaker adopts.
By adopting a third-party perspective and relying upon their folk notion of interpreting literally, speakers were able to distinguish between semantic and pragmatic meaning more reliably.
The study will be published in the scholarly journal Language.
Source: ANI
Typing can Influence the Meaning of Words
Words that use most letters on the right side of the QWERTY keyboard - most common modern-day keyboard layout - are associated with more positive emotions.
Advertisement
Advertisement
|
Advertisement
Latest General Health News
The Pakistan Ministry has announced the commencement of a nationwide polio vaccination campaign beginning on October 2, aiming to immunize more children.
In a tragic incident, a woman in the US experienced the loss of all her limbs as a result of a bacterial outbreak linked to the consumption of contaminated fish.
FluMos-v2, a unique universal influenza vaccine candidate, undergoing a phase 1 trial at NIH, increases recipients' immunity against many influenza viruses.
In Pakistan, the polio campaign focuses on more than 270,000 children under the age of five years, residing in areas with insufficient vaccine coverage.
Dangers of Wrong Diagnosis: Diagnostic errors in healthcare can increase the risk of permanent disabilities and deaths.
