The survival of premature infants without severe or moderate neuromotor and sensory disabilities increased with the longer gestation period.
Children born between 27 and 34 weeks' gestation may be at risk of developmental delay but data on their outcome is limited. So a team of researchers, who are based at INSERM, the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research compared rates of survival - and survival without neuromotor and sensory disabilities such as cerebral palsy, blindness and deafness - in children born alive at 22-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks' gestation in 1997 and 2011.
‘Despite improvements in neuromotor and sensory outcomes, a high number of children born before 34 weeks are at risk of developmental delay.’
Survival of preterm babies has increased worldwide. Using data from the EPIPAGE study - designed to investigate outcomes of preterm children over the past 15 years - they identified 5,567 infants born at 22 to 34 weeks' gestation in 2011 in France. The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) was used to assess developmental delay. Rates of survival without severe or moderate neuromotor and sensory disabilities at 2 years of age were
- 48.5% for children born at 22-26 weeks' gestation
- 90% at 27-31 weeks' gestation, and
- 97.5% at 32-34 weeks' gestation
- Only one child born at 22-23 weeks' gestation survived
Rates of cerebral palsy decreased by 3.3% between the two time periods, which was statistically significant, at both 24-31 and 32-34 weeks' gestation.
After excluding children with cerebral palsy, blindness, deafness, or severe congenital brain malformations, 50%, 41%, and 36% of children born at 24-26, 27-31, and 32-34 weeks' gestation, respectively, had ASQ scores below threshold and were considered at risk of developmental delay. Delays in language development as well as poorer social-emotional competence most frequently scored below threshold.
The authors point out that this is an observational study, so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, and they outline some limitations which could have introduced bias.
Advertisement
And they suggest that using parental questionnaires as a first step approach to assess development "may allow clinical resources to be focused on those most likely to benefit."
Advertisement