New research from Johns Hopkins finds that one-third of transplant surgeons in the United States overreacted and began routinely using fewer organs from high-risk donors

"These organs help people and the risk of contracting an infectious disease from them is very small compared with other risks in transplantation," said Dorry L. Segev, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the study''s leader. "There is ample evidence that many patients are better off receiving organs from high-risk donors than waiting for a different organ, but that''s not what''s happening in many transplant centers."
Donors considered by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to be at high risk for infection include intravenous drug users, men who have sex with men and prostitutes. They comprise nearly 10 percent of organ donors in the U.S. and are tested for HIV and other infections before their organs are approved for transplantation. But, Segev says, the tests sometimes, as in the Chicago case, don''t find the infection.
Transplant experts believe the Chicago case occurred when the deceased donor''s HIV infection was too recent to show up on the screening tests administered before transplantation. Four patients at four different Chicago-area hospitals received contaminated organs and were later diagnosed with the virus.
For the current study, Segev and his colleagues performed a national survey of 422 transplant surgeon use of, and attitudes toward, organs from high-risk donors before and after the 2007 transmission.
Among the changes that came about after the Chicago episode, the survey found, was the use by some surgeons of new consent forms that explained the risks presented by high-risk donor organs or counseling sessions that emphasized the risk. For example, some consent forms now highlight the limitations of blood tests, which can''t catch every HIV infection, notably those that are recent.
He says surgeons may be backing off from use of high-risk organs because they are afraid of being sued or anticipate pressure from regulators. "The litigious and regulatory environment we''re currently in is not acting in the best interests of patients, and may actually harm patients," Segev says.
The Johns Hopkins Hospital performs NAT on organs from all high-risk donors. The hospital closely monitors recipients of such organs after transplant to start anti-viral therapy immediately in the unlikely event that an infection could occur, Segev says. He adds that NAT is not the national standard.
Other Johns Hopkins researchers who worked on this study include Lauren M. Kucirka, Sc.M.; R. Loris Ros, Sc.M.; Aruna K. Subramanian, M.D.; and Robert A. Montgomery, M.D., Ph.D.
For more information:
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/transplant/About/Segev.html
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/transplant/
Source-Newswise
MEDINDIA




Email







