The authors developed the algorithm on a group of patients with known outcomes then tested it on pretreatment serum for independent validation and control groups. Patients who were predicted to have "good" outcomes survived for a median of 306 days, while those in the "poor" group survived a median of 107 days.
"In the clinical development of biomarkers for the individualization of therapy, it is important to distinguish between those who will benefit from an intervention from those independent of the planned intervention. Biomarkers predictive for survival benefit from an intervention are much more useful for guiding management"the authors said."Use of (Protein)signature will reduce rates of both overtreatment and undertreatment and improve survival for NSCLC patients," the authors added.
In the second study, Kiyoshi Yanagisawa, M.D., Ph.D., of Nagoya University in Japan, and colleagues analyzed protein patterns in NSCLC tumor tissue and normal lung tissue. The researchers identified a pattern that was associated with increased survival among NSCLC patients and may distinguish patients with poor prognosis from those with good prognosis. They also tested their model on independent validation and control groups.
Source: Eurekalert
LIN/M