In skiers, an intensive training schedule is associated with increased non-allergic asthma risk.

TOP INSIGHT
Prevalence of non-allergic asthma was highest among the most successful skiers, suggesting that it doesn’t seem to hamper competitive chances.
Researchers wanted to gauge the relative proportions of allergic and non-allergic asthma among competitive cross-country skiers compared with the general population. They also wanted to find out what impact performance level and training intensity might have.
They invited all Finnish cross-country skiers who had enrolled in either national championships (from the age of 17 onwards) or the largest national junior skiing Hopeasompa competition (13–16 year olds) to complete a questionnaire on asthma development.
Non-Allergic Asthma in Cross-Country Skiers
Of a total of 1,282 competitive skiers, 351 responded. They were matched for age, gender and geographical region with 338 people who weren’t cross-country skiers.Current asthma was defined as experiencing at least one of the following: three asthma-related symptoms cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, wheezing or phlegm; active use of any asthma medication or an Asthma Control Test (ACT) score of fewer than 25 points to indicate good asthma control.
Asthma was defined as allergic if a doctor had diagnosed the respondent and if exposure to furry animals or pollen prompted asthma-related symptoms. Otherwise, asthma was defined as non-allergic.
Some 189 of the skiers had been diagnosed or tested for asthma and 91 of them had current symptoms. This compares with 69 of the non-skiers, 31 of whom had current symptoms. More of the skiers used medication to control their asthma: 123 versus 39.
The difference in the prevalence of non-allergic asthma between the two groups was significant (60% vs. 39%), starting from the age of 14 onwards. No such difference was seen in the prevalence of allergic asthma between the two groups.
Cross-country skiers were nearly 3.5 times as likely to have asthma, nearly twice as likely to have allergic asthma, but more than 5 times as likely to have non-allergic asthma as non-skiers.
In both groups, asthma in parents or siblings and allergic rhinitis were strongly associated with current asthma. But sporting success and training hours were also influential.
In total, 163 (46%+) skiers had participated in FIS competitions. Skiers with asthma had fewer FIS points than those without asthma: 173.22 versus 213.65.
And in the most successful skiers—those with the fewest FIS points—the prevalence of asthma was the highest (56%) with 65% of this non-allergic. This group was also the oldest and trained the most.
Training for 100 or more hours every year was associated with 35% greater odds of non-allergic asthma compared with 18% greater odds of allergic asthma.
This is an observational study and as such can’t establish cause. And although the largest survey of cross-country skiers of its kind, the response rates were relatively low, acknowledged the researchers.
Much of the information provided also relied on recall and subjective assessment of symptoms.
But: “Before starting their skiing career, there was no difference in asthma prevalence between cross-country skiers and the [comparison group], and the [comparison group] mainly had allergic asthma,” they pointed out.
“We conclude that the excess prevalence of asthma among competitive cross-country skiers compared with that in the general population is mainly because of non-allergic asthma emerging a couple of years after the onset of an active skiing career.”
And they explained: “The current findings suggest that intensive training in cold air is the trigger for inducing the excess of non-allergic asthma in skiers.”
“This relation between intensive training and non-allergic asthma might be related to airway damage caused by cold air because airway damage has been suggested as one of the risk factors for non-allergic asthma.”
Source-Eurekalert
MEDINDIA




Email










