Nocturnal respiratory rate can help identify whether a defibrillator will help extend the life of patients with arrhythmia.

TOP INSIGHT
Nocturnal respiratory rate can help predict the success of ICD treatment among heart patients.
Read More..
However, the effectiveness of implanting ICDs is sometimes questionable. The latest Heart Surgery Report by the German Heart Foundation also notes that the benefits of defibrillator therapy are not as clear-cut as previously believed. Moreover, they are often offset by relatively common complications arising both during and after the implantation procedure.
Predictive value of the nocturnal respiratory rate
Researchers at TUM have now demonstrated that the nocturnal respiratory rate of heart patients - which has hitherto received little attention - can help to predict the success of ICD treatment. Between May 2014 and September 2018 they monitored 1,971 heart patients at 44 European heart centers.
1,363 of the patients received an ICD, while the control group was treated conservatively. The different treatment options were dictated by the varying availability of ICD t
In both groups the scientists measured the average nocturnal respiratory rate between midnight and 6 am based on an ECG protocol. The ICD patients had a survival advantage of 31.3 percent over the control group.
A biosignal hitherto neglected by cardiologists
"The breathing rate has been largely ignored as a biosignal in the field of cardiology," says Prof. Georg Schmidt, the last author of the study, who heads the working group for biosignal processing at TUM's university hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar.
"Our conclusions will now place a greater focus on this parameter," says Prof. Schmidt, noting that the study demonstrates the predictive value of breathing frequency for therapeutic efficacy. "Especially in borderline cases, checking the patient's breathing rate can help to decide on the right therapy."
Randomized study needed
Against this backdrop, Schmidt, who also chairs the TUM Ethics Commission, believes that it would be reasonable to aim for a randomized study versus the established guidelines.
"This would involve dividing the patients observed to gain no advantage from the ICD in our study into two groups, with one having an ICD implanted and the other receiving conservative treatment.
If a randomized study of this kind reveals that heart patients with a higher nocturnal breathing rate do not benefit from the ICD implant, they could be spared this invasive treatment in the future."
Source-Eurekalert
MEDINDIA

Email










