Slavishly following long-held guidelines for diagnosing the cause of arthritis-related back pain is resulting in excessive tests, delays in pain relief

"The whole way we're doing this is wrong," says study leader Steven P. Cohen, M.D., an associate professor of anaesthesiology and critical care medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
"If we just do the radio frequency procedure first, we're going to help more people and we're going to save a lot of money."
The study revealed that among those who had radio-frequency treatment, success rates were higher in those who had the diagnostic blocks first because they were more likely to actually have arthritis.
"When you do two blocks, you may be wrongly weeding out many people who would actually benefit from radio-frequency denervation," said Cohen.
Cohen notes that radiofrequency denervation is as safe as giving a diagnostic block and need only be done once for relief of symptoms.
Advertisements
Cohen and colleagues believe that making diagnostic accuracy a higher priority than pain relief may be misguided.
Advertisements
Cohen cautions that diagnostic nerve blocks are called for in some cases.
For example, they should be used to determine whether surgery is the right option for relieving certain kinds of back pain in people without a clear-cut anatomical problem in order to avoid an unnecessary, risky operation.
The new study is published in the August issue of the journal Anaesthesiology.
Source-ANI