Bodily fluids like blood could be an easier way to test for glioblastoma, than a biopsy, which is both invasive and painful for patients, reports a new study. The findings of the study are published in the journal Communications Biology.
A team from Professor Georgios Giamas' lab at the University of Sussex has identified novel biomarkers within bodily fluids, which signal the presence of the tumor.
Cancer biomarkers are molecules that are either exclusively found or over-expressed in cancer cells, as compared to 'normal,' healthy cells. Biomarkers can be considered as biological signatures for a disease, as they indicate the presence of cancer in the body.
The discovery suggests that bodily fluids like blood could be a simpler way to test for glioblastoma, rather than a biopsy, which is both invasive and painful for the patient as well as taking considerable time to get the results.
Georgios Giamas, Professor of Cancer Cell Signalling in the School of Life Sciences, said: "At the moment, the outlook for glioblastoma patients is bleak. As the most aggressive type of brain tumor, the survival rate is low.
"Our research provides more information about the markers which can signal the presence of glioblastoma - and the fact we've been able to identify ones that are associated with extracellular vesicles, suggests that there could be a way to use bodily fluids to test for the tumor in future."
Currently, a growing body of research is looking into the possibility of developing liquid-biopsies like blood tests to spot other types of cancers (e.g., pancreatic). Rather than taking a piece of tissue from a respective organ, liquid biopsies would allow doctors to take a small sample of blood and test for a range of biomarkers which will help identify the subtype of tumor.
Dr. Thomas Simon, the co-author of this study, highlighted that: "Liquid biopsies mean a less invasive procedure for patients, and arguably quicker results - something which is invaluable for those with an aggressive tumor that severely cuts life expectancy.
"But it could also mean better patient follow-up care, as a simple test can be carried out to check for the efficacy of existing treatments or for monitoring relapse.
"The more we know about biomarkers, the better, so this is a step which should provide hope for anyone whose lives have been impacted by glioblastoma."
There are three sub-types of glioblastoma which all have biomarkers containing different information. The more researchers find out about these signatures, the more work can be done to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and to personalize treatment depending on the sub-type of cancer.
Rosemary Lane, a Ph.D. student in Professor Giamas' lab and co-author of the study, added: "Glioblastoma subtyping is crucial for patient prognosis and personalized therapies. The fact that we can identify these molecular differences in extracellular vesicles is very exciting and will be of huge importance for discovering new biomarkers in the future."
Marian Vintu, a neurosurgeon and co-author, said: "Clinical research in brain cancer is such a powerful tool to expand our knowledge in this terrible disease and improve our patient's outcome."
The next step for Professor Giamas' team will be to test and validate the presence of these newly described biomarkers in glioblastoma patients. The research, funded by the charity Action Against Cancer, suggests that this technique could ultimately become an option for diagnosing glioblastoma.