Mental Health Act, 1987 - Description

Email Print This Page bookmark
Font : A-A+

Mental Health Act, 1987






2. The experience of the working of Indian Lunacy Act, 1912 ( 4 of 1912) has revealed that it has become out-moded. With the rapid advance of medical science and the understanding of the nature of malady, it has become necessary to have fresh legislation with provisions for treatment of mentally ill persons in accordance with the new approach.

3. It is considered necessary - 

             1.  To regulate admission to psychiatric hospitals or psychiatric nursing homes of mentally ill-persons who do not have sufficient understanding to seek treatment on a voluntary basis, and to protect the rights of such persons while being detained;
             2.   To protect society from the presence of mentally ill persons who have become or might become a danger or nuisance to others;
              3.  To protect citizens from being detained in psychiatric hospitals or psychiatric nursing homes without sufficient cause;
              4.  To regulate responsibility for maintenance charges of mentally ill persons who are admitted to psychiatric hospitals or psychiatric nursing homes;
              5.  To provide facilities for establishing guardianship or custody of mentally ill persons who are incapable of managing their own affairs;
               6.  To provide for the establishment of Central Authority and State Authorities for Mental Health Services;
               7.  To regulate the powers of the Government for establishing, licensing and controlling psychiatric hospitals and psychiatric nursing homes for mentally ill persons;
               8. To provide for legal aid to mentally ill persons at State expense in certain cases.

4. The main object of the Bill is to implement the aforesaid proposals.



It is well settled that when the language of the statute is clear and admits of no ambiguity, recourse to the Statement of Objects and Reasons for the purpose of construing a statutory provision is not permissible. Court must strive to so interpret the statute as to protect and advance the object and purpose of the enactment. Any narrow or technical interpretation of the provisions would defeat the legislative policy. The Court must, therefore, keep the legislative policy in mind in applying the provisions of the Act to the facts of the case2.


The law is well settled that though the Statement of objects and Reasons accompanying a legislative bill could not be used to determine the true meaning and effect of the substantive provisions of a statute, it was permissible to refer to the same for the purpose of understanding the background, the antecedent state of affairs, the surrounding circumstances in relation to the statute, and the evil which the statute sought to remedy3.


PREAMBLE - It is established law that preamble discloses the primary intention of the statute but does override the express provisions of the statute4. Although a preamble of a statute is a key to interpretation of the provisions of the Act, but the intention of Legislature is not necessarily to be gathered from the preamble taken by itself, but to be gathered from the provisions of the Act. Where the language of the Act is clear, the preamble cannot be a guide, but where the object or meaning of the provisions of the Act is not clear then an aid from the preamble can be taken into consideration for purpose of explaining the provisions of the Act5.


It is now well settled that the preamble of a statutory instrument cannot control the express clear language and sweep of the operating provisions of such an instrument. Nor can the express language of a statutory provision be curtailed or read down in the light of the preamble in the absence of any ambiguity in the enacted provisions6.



Post a Comment

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
Notify me when reply is posted
I agree to the terms and conditions
Smitha789, India

I have a sister who studied till 12th and know does not speak anything and behaves very different. In my and my dad absence my mom hits her. How can I stop this. I & dad hav tried a lot to stop but it doesnot work

mandeep.s, India

Thanks for the above details,
My questions;
If a psychiatrist[ retired as colnol , senior advisor from Armed forces] is operating his clinic and he is treating a patient for 1year,
1] can he abandon or refuse the treatment to his patient.. ?
2] can he refuse to give first aid to a sudden out burst of his mentally ill patient ?
I would appreciate your response

gurgaon.anil, India

my brother is admitted to a IHBAS, shahdra delhi for the past 2 months. the doctors have quoted the mental health act and informed that if we cannot keep him admitted beyond 89 days without permission from metropolitan magistrate. however, we being based in gurgaon, if we apply to our state's MM, the case will be referred to PGIMS, Rohtak and only when they give in writing that they cannot treat him, he can continue treatment at IHBAS. kindly guide me on this thank you

amitava66, India


Dr Desai, United Kingdom

Dear Sir/Madam,what are the minimum facilities prescribed for the admission, treatment and care of mentally ill persons in terms staff and space ratio for a psychiatric hospital under mental health act 1987 for a licence?

Medindia Newsletters

Subscribe to our Free Newsletters!

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Find a Doctor

Stay Connected

  • Available on the Android Market
  • Available on the App Store