The Study: Efficacy of a Theory-Based Abstinence-Only Intervention, John B. Jemmott III, PhD; Loretta S. Jemmott, PhD, RN; Geoffrey T. Fong, PhD Arch Pediatr Adolesc ed. 2010; 164(2):152-159.
Advertisement
Background: Study focused on young African American preteens in an urban area: This is a legitimate public health study and it did show that a certain type of abstinence only program can help some very young adolescents (average age 12) delay sexual initiation for up to 24 months.
Advertisement
The study provides no data in support of the failed abstinence-only-until-marriage programs of the Bush era: The abstinence-only intervention in this study would not have been eligible for federal funding during the Bush years because it did not fit the restrictive, ideological requirements of those abstinence-only-until-marriage programs. The program goal was to help early teens avoid sex until they are ready--a totally different objective than the Bush-era programs which were proven ineffective by the long-term Mathematica study (which showed "no impact on teen behavior"). In the Jemmotts' own words: "It was not designed to meet federal criteria for abstinence-only programs. For instance, the target behavior was abstaining from vaginal, anal, and oral intercourse until a time later in life when the adolescent is more prepared to handle the consequences of sex. The intervention did not contain inaccurate information, portray sex in a negative light, or use a moralistic tone. The training and curriculum manual explicitly instructed the facilitators not to disparage the efficacy of condoms or allow the view that condoms are ineffective to go uncorrected."
Public Policy Implications: Five Points to Keep in Mind
-- Almost one-quarter of the young people in the study were already sexually active when the study began. An abstinence-only program provides no information about condoms and contraception to help sexually active youth protect their health and safety.
SOURCE Advocates for Youth
