Texas Passes Bill To Halt Order Mandating HPV Vaccine for School Girls

by Medindia Content Team on  April 27, 2007 at 8:17 PM General Health News   - G J E 4
Texas Passes Bill To Halt Order Mandating HPV Vaccine for School Girls
The Texas House on Wednesday voted 135-2 to pass (HB 1098) a Senate-approved bill that would prevent mandatory vaccination for middle school girls in the state until 2011, the New York Times reports.

Gov. Rick Perry (R) on Feb. 2 issued an executive order that mandates that all girls entering the sixth grade beginning in September 2008 receive an HPV vaccine. Perry has said the executive order will allow parents who do not want their daughters to receive an HPV vaccine "for reasons of conscience, including religious beliefs," to opt out of the requirement.

Under the executive order, girls and women ages nine to 21 who are eligible for public assistance will be able to receive Merck's HPV vaccine Gardasil at no cost beginning immediately.

The Senate on Monday voted 30-1 to pass the measure (New York Times, 4/26). Perry has 10 days, excluding Sundays, to decide whether he will sign it into law, allow it to become law without his signature or veto it, the Houston Chronicle reports.

A Perry spokesperson declined to say if the governor would veto the measure, the Austin American-Statesman reports. If Perry vetoes the bill, the Legislature could override it with a two-thirds majority vote in each chamber before the session ends May 28.

According to the American-Statesman, an override "seems likely" because both the House and Senate voted by large margins to pass the bill. Perry spokesperson Krista Moody said, "The governor looks forward to a day when cervical cancer is eradicated and Texas women no longer have to cope with the devastating effects of this disease," adding that the Legislature's vote will "delay that day for another four years".

According to the Times, the next Legislature, which convenes in 2009, might revisit the vaccine program.

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions
There is no evidence that Gardasil prevents cervical cancer because it was never tested for preventing cervical cancer. The Wall Street Journal, 4/16/2007, in a front page article exposed the dubious claims of Merck for this vaccine. On April 18, 2007, Cancer Monthly went even further, explaining that HPV does not, on its own, cause cervical cancer. With adverse event reports of seizures, convulsions, and internal bleeding now being reported to the Federal Government's VAERS web site and the idea that this vaccine prevents cervical cancer debunked, why is this vaccine still on the market? And why is there not a Congressional investigation of Merck's false claims on Gardasil along with Vioxx.
guest Saturday, April 28, 2007
There is no real comparison between the HPV and HBV vaccines. The vectors are more widespread for HBV, whereas HPV is only transmitted by a single route. I am completely confident that my daughter, who would have been affected by this vaccine, is not now, nor will she for some time to come, at risk of exposure to this route. I know best for my daughter on the basis of both parenting and medicine.
guest Saturday, April 28, 2007

You May Also Like

View All