United States : A study has indicated that blood tests which were designed to be detect heart attack or stroke risk, are only as good as cholesterol tests , or blood pressure tests and not superior to them, in terms of being a veritable risk indicator.
Doctors have been making too much of substances in the blood which they interpreted as indicators of a heart attack risk. The substances were C-reactive protein, or CRP; homocysteine; and BNP, or B-type natriuretic peptide.
AdvertisementIt is becoming a trend where family doctors have directed many patients to undergo these tests to detect these substances, with a motive of detecting a heart risk and averting them.
Scientists from the reputed Framingham Heart Study unraveled that the tests of CRP, BNP, homocysteine and seven other substances are just a few notches above the standard tests in forecasting potential heart attack risks.
Lead author Thomas J Wang, a Harvard Medical School assistant professor said, "It's a little bit disappointing. The traditional risk factors that have stood the test of time turn out to be the best evaluation of risk."
PMistletoe Is Good For Christmas Decorations, Not For Cancer U.S. Teens Moving Away from Illicit Drugs, but Jump from the Frying Pan to the Fire M
You May Also Like