Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center scientists have completed the first draft of the genetic code for breast and colon cancers. Their report, published online in the September 7 issue of Science Express, identifies close to 200 mutated genes, now linked to these cancers, most of which were not previously recognized as associated with tumor initiation, growth, spread or control.
'Just as sequencing the human genome laid the groundwork for subsequent research in genetics, these data lay the foundation for decades of research on colon and breast cancers,' says Victor Velculescu, M.D., Ph.D., assistant professor of oncology at the Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center.
Although gene discoveries by independent scientists scattered around the world have provided clues, Velculescu says relatively few genes have been shown to be altered in cancers. The Hopkins gene hunters say the number of genes that were altered in breast and colorectal cancer genomes surprised them. 'We expected to find a handful of genes, not 200,' says Tobias Sjöblom, a lead author and postdoctoral fellow at Hopkins' Kimmel Cancer Center.
Despite the potential rewards envisioned by cancer biologists, efforts to map cancer genes have drawn criticism from others who say that funding dollars should be spent on projects yielding more immediate benefits for detection and treatment.
'These are good debates to have,' says Kenneth Kinzler, Ph.D., professor of oncology and co-director of the Ludwig Center at Johns Hopkins, but 'we are convinced that this kind of study will provide one of the best road maps possible for beating cancer. Who would pass up the opportunity to read the enemy's game plan?'
Some gene alterations already have led to successful detection and treatment strategies. These include the breast cancer drug Herceptin - which targets a breast cancer cell receptor made by the Her2-neu gene -- and blood tests for hereditary colon cancer, based on the APC gene and others identified by the Hopkins group.
'Cancer scientists recognize that merely identifying pieces of DNA that have a role in the disease is a beginning, not an end to our work,' says Bert Vogelstein, M.D., an investigator at the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and co-director of the Ludwig Center at Johns Hopkins, 'but by using a more systematic method to identify genes that play an essential role in cancer, we will be able to guide that work.'
The Hopkins team began their project with 11 samples each from breast and colon cancers, removed from patients after surgery. Within each tumor cell, billions of individual chemicals called nucleotides pair together in a preprogrammed fashion to build the rungs of a DNA ladder that compose genetic instructions. Changes called mutations in the nucleotides can create coding errors that transform a normal cell into a cancerous one.
To locate the altered nucleotides, the scientists compared the genetic code of their tumor samples with normal ones. First, they used the Human Genome Project (HGP) to identify the sequences of best-known genes - more than 13,000 in all - roughly two-thirds of the total number of genes identified by the HGP. The actual number of human genes is still in dispute, but is estimated to be about 20,000.
Then, in each tumor, the scientists examined the DNA code of these 13,000 genes by dividing each gene into overlapping sections - about 10 per gene - to get 130,000 sections for analysis. Each segment was amplified through a process called polymerase chain reaction, purified, and its sequence determined using more than three million biochemical reactions. The sequences were fed through computer software that matches up normal sequences with those from tumor samples. The software highlighted more than 800,000 suspicious regions that were visually inspected, one by one, to verify that they were true mutations that altered protein code rather than normal variations or minor changes with no effect on the gene product.
In total, the Hopkins team combed through 465 million nucleotides - several encyclopedias' worth of letters - to find approximately 1,500 DNA nucleotides that differed from the normal code in important ways. Virtually all these mistakes were mere single-nucleotide 'typos.' Some 200 genes were significantly mutated; the mutated genes in breast and colon cancers were almost completely distinct, suggesting very different pathways for the development of each of these cancer types.
Says Kinzler, 'This gives us some understanding of why breast and colon cancers, and most likely other cancers as well, are very different diseases and develop through different processes. When we say this will drive cancer research for the next couple of decades, this is one of the reasons. Now researchers will study how these mutations occur in breast and colon cancers, perhaps searching for environmental agents or cellular processes that drive these changes.'
The Hopkins team also found that the average number of mutant genes in each cancer is about 100, and at least 20 are likely to be crucial for tumor formation. 'Each cancer has a different blueprint,' says Velculescu. 'No two patients are identical.'
Other cancers also can be evaluated using the Hopkins approach, which they say has been developed over the past two decades and made possible through recent advances in DNA sequencing and bioinformatics.
'These findings will guide and provide support for future comprehensive genetic studies including those envisioned by The Cancer Genome Atlas Project,' says Vogelstein. Future research will include performing similar analyses on other tumors types, charting the pathways through which each mutant gene acts, and looking for common mutations that can be targeted with cancer drugs or used to detect the disease earlier.