Medindia

X

Thrifty Gene Hypothesis Proved Wrong

by Julia Samuel on  September 23, 2016 at 10:55 PM Obesity News   - G J E 4
The thrifty gene hypothesis is certainly appealing, like many other evolutionary explanations of our physiology and behavior and it's probably wrong, according to a new study.
Thrifty Gene Hypothesis Proved Wrong
Thrifty Gene Hypothesis Proved Wrong
Advertisement

At their core, such arguments assume that specific genes evolved to deal with specific challenges we faced in the past, and if those genes are causing problems today, it's because we haven't had time to fully adapt to a rapidly changing world.

‘Thrifty genes are genes which enable individuals to efficiently collect and process food to deposit fat during periods of food abundance in order to provide for periods of food shortage.’
Advertisement
The problem is, evolution doesn't work like that. It's a noisy process that produces, as one source calls it, "selection, not perfection." For a whole variety of reasons, not every gene in our DNA is completely good for us.

In 106 of the genes they examined, there was no evidence at all for positive selection.

Guanlin Wang and John Speakman wanted a direct test. In particular, they searched for genetic signatures of what's called "positive selection,"—signs that nature actually favored some degree of obesity over skinnier body types—in 115 genes associated with body-mass index (BMI), the most common, albeit flawed, measure of obesity.

Drawing on data from the 1000 Genomes Project, Wang and Speakman looked at how much a gene's individual nucleotides—the basic molecular building blocks of DNA—vary from person to person. Roughly speaking, the less variation there is in a particular gene, the more evidence there is for positive selection.

Wang and Speakman's analysis found little reason to believe nature preferred obesity. In 106 of the genes they examined, there was no evidence at all for positive selection. Of the remaining nine, five genes showed signs of positive selection, but in the wrong direction—that is, natural selection pushed those genes toward variants that favored leaner bodies over obesity.

The study has some limitations, of course. For one thing, BMI isn't a particularly accurate measure of body fat, so the genes Wang and Speakman focused on may not provide the best test of the thrifty gene hypothesis. In addition, the specific methods Wang and Speakman used work best when selection is "hard," that is, when nature rapidly and near-completely weeds out inferior genes.

For the time being, however, "there is little evidence to support the thrifty gene hypothesis that obesity is the consequence of selection under famines or indeed that obesity has been positively selected for any other reason," Wang and Speakman write.

Source: Medindia
Advertisement

Post your Comments

Comments should be on the topic and should not be abusive. The editorial team reserves the right to review and moderate the comments posted on the site.
User Avatar
* Your comment can be maximum of 2500 characters
Notify me when reply is posted I agree to the terms and conditions

You May Also Like

Advertisement
View All